Is that 22.5 times faster, or 22.5% faster or what? There seemed to be
a word or unit of some kind missing there.
Yes that is 22.5 times faster.
Here, I dug out the mail they sent me:
"I'm getting about a factor of 22 improvement: from 0.56 mflops on
<200Mhz Atmark Armadillo ARM920T, debian e
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 09:51:31PM +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
> The FFTW people ran their benchmark on a 233 MHz armel slab here,
> obtaining 22.5 faster performance than old Debian arm on 200MHz.
> Of course, that's pure FP, soft float in both cases though of different
> kinds.
Is that 22.5 times
Just out of curiosity, have anyone that is using armel done any real
life performance comparisons against ?
The FFTW people ran their benchmark on a 233 MHz armel slab here,
obtaining 22.5 faster performance than old Debian arm on 200MHz.
Of course, that's pure FP, soft float in both cases thoug
Hi
Just out of curiosity, have anyone that is using armel done any real
life performance comparisons against ? What i'm after is not pure FP
benchmarks, rather if you seen any performance difference running the
same set of services.
/Mikael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
4 matches
Mail list logo
