https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22831#c25
steve, mike, any news on the use of the options recommended in comment
#25 ? this for native 32-bit builds.
Ian Lance Taylor 2019-01-09 23:48:45 UTC
When using gold the key options are --no-mmap-output-file
--no-map-whole-files --no-keep
On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:18:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> >> >Would it be worth trying to link with gold for these?
> >>
> >> It might be, yes. I can try that with iceweasel on an imx53 or Panda
> >> with 1GB if you like. Are there any non
Something I didn't expect - it seems the toolchain in sid armhf is
already configured to use gold by default using symlinks. I've done a
gold build, now running with ld.bfd for comparison
AIUI there is a package called "binutils-gold", if this is installed the
default linker
will be ld.gold, i
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:32:08PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> [ dropped -release, added direct mail to Mike; dunno if you're
> subscribed to d-arm... ]
I'm not.
> >OK, cool. Building with ld and gold on a panda right now, to see how
> >they compare.
>
> Something I didn't expect - it seems
[ dropped -release, added direct mail to Mike; dunno if you're
subscribed to d-arm... ]
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 02:54:47PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:18:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> On Wed, May
Hello,
2012/5/16 Steve McIntyre :
> [ Responding for both armel and armhf ]
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:46PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>>Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
>>http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
>>as would any other
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:18:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> >Hi Steve,
>>
>> Hey Mike,
>>
>> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >Hi Steve,
>
> Hey Mike,
>
> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
> >
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>Hi Steve,
Hey Mike,
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
>> memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds.
>
>As maintainer o
Hi Steve,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
> memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds.
As maintainer of such a package that pushes buildds limits, I have a
question.
Isn't memory r
[ Responding for both armel and armhf ]
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:46PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
>we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
>architectures for the Wheezy release.
>
>Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
