On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:31:51AM -0800, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> I'm really happy that you've made this stuff available. Thank you so much!
>
> However, I'm concerned about your band width and availability from the
> yank side of the pond. Is anyone mirroring this repository yet? Or
> pl
I'm really happy that you've made this stuff available. Thank you so much!
However, I'm concerned about your band width and availability from the
yank side of the pond. Is anyone mirroring this repository yet? Or
planning to?
--rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-20 23:12]:
> I'd really recommend...
>
> > blah.F90: In function 'specific__mod_i8':
> > blah.F90:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See http://gcc.gnu
I'd really recommend...
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:17:27PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> blah.F90: In function 'specific__mod_i8':
> blah.F90:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 12:57:38 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:01:27AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
[ list of patches needed ]
I just took the time the other day to check some of the patches I
produced some time ago for the N770 and file bug reports where
relevant,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:01:28AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> gcc currently segfaults (not ICEs, but segfaults) when natively
> building libfortran. This needs looking into.
This is a minimal test case that crashes the fortran compiler (seen
when building "../../../src/libgfortran/generat
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:29:44AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > strace needs to be taught about the new system call convention.
>
> #360152 has a patch.
Thanks, I added a (patched) strace package to the pool.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:57:38PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> strace needs to be taught about the new system call convention.
#360152 has a patch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:01:27AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> The deb repository, with close to 9000 packages, is located at
The first compile pass through the archive (started 10 days ago)
finished this morning, and there's now 9877 debs successfully built
(while there were around 1500 wh
2007/1/13, Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yay. What armv4t hardware are you using?
That's an iPAQ h1940 with samsung S3C2410, a 233MHz arm920t.
gcc support for Crunch kind of sucks.
Well, there will be loads of developers wanting it to work well now,
which is maybe what it needed...
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:39:52PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> >
> > http://armel.applieddata.net/developers/linux/eabi/armel-root-fs.tar.bz2
>
> Excellent. Works perfectly for me on real armv4t hardware with no FPU
> (using the angstrom EABI kernel)
Yay. What armv4t hardware are you usi
2007/1/12, Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://armel.applieddata.net/developers/linux/eabi/armel-root-fs.tar.bz2
Excellent. Works perfectly for me on real armv4t hardware with no FPU
(using the angstrom EABI kernel)
Code speed/size comparison compared to old ABI using lame to
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:43:12PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> > > I can't share the debs yet (internal and customer use only for now),
> >
> > Is publishing estimated how soon?
>
> I hope soon, but I can't say yet, and I'm not the one deciding this.
> In my opinion, it's only fair that th
13 matches
Mail list logo
