>#if !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__powerpc__) && !defined(__sparc__) && !
>defined(__mips__)
>
>Presumably that ifdef isn't precise enough for this case?
Yeah. Whether it can be done with an ifdef in this case depends on exactly
what X is doing with its privileges - someone needs to check
>> Umm, no, modern suns have *PCI*. (It is probably fair to say that
>> nothing "modern" has ISA :-)
>
>my RiscStation has an ISA slot ;-)
QED
p.
> spot the person that confused two TLAs.
well, unless someone in this pile meant Instruction Set Architecture...
> And are Phil and Wookey really hoping that *I*'m going to go grovelling
./xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c:434:
FatalError("%s: Failed to set IOP
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:35:15AM -0400, Mark Eichin wrote:
>
> > Mmm. Modern suns have ISA. Am I right in thinking that older Suns don't?
>
> Umm, no, modern suns have *PCI*. (It is probably fair to say that
> nothing "modern" has ISA :-)
spot the person that confused two TLAs.
Righto. So on
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:35:15AM -0400, Mark Eichin wrote:
>
> > Mmm. Modern suns have ISA. Am I right in thinking that older Suns don't?
>
> Umm, no, modern suns have *PCI*. (It is probably fair to say that
> nothing "modern" has ISA :-)
my RiscStation has an ISA slot ;-)
--
Ben
Those who
> Mmm. Modern suns have ISA. Am I right in thinking that older Suns don't?
Umm, no, modern suns have *PCI*. (It is probably fair to say that
nothing "modern" has ISA :-)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:01:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
>
> Mmm. Modern suns have ISA. Am I right in thinking that older Suns don't?
> [just sbus] So shouldn't they be in this mess too then?
>
> Also do
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 11:01:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >Surely fbdev is being very dense if it's doing that?
> >1: Why would it need to turn on anything, as it's only talking to the kernel
> >2: Surely it's not just an arm thing, as other hardware doesn't have ISA
> > [I'd guess Amiga
>Surely fbdev is being very dense if it's doing that?
>1: Why would it need to turn on anything, as it's only talking to the kernel
>2: Surely it's not just an arm thing, as other hardware doesn't have ISA
> [I'd guess Amigas don't, and I'd assume that fbdev should work on them]
I'm guessing it'
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:13:22PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >xf86EnableIOPorts: Failed to set IOPL for I/O
> >
> >what does this mean? Did I get something else wrong in the Y/N questions
> >for the config?
>
> Uh, oh dear. It seems to be trying to turn on access to ISA I/O ports. I'll
>
>xf86EnableIOPorts: Failed to set IOPL for I/O
>
>what does this mean? Did I get something else wrong in the Y/N questions
>for the config?
Uh, oh dear. It seems to be trying to turn on access to ISA I/O ports. I'll
have a think about how best to avoid that.
p.
Is there a good way to get XFree86 4.0.2-13 working on a RiscPC.
After correcting the generated config file to /dev/sunmouse and "BusMouse"
protocol (grr. did I do something stupid or doesn't the config gizmo give
me those options?) I tried running X but after flicking to the new virtual
terminal a
12 matches
Mail list logo
