On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 20:07, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Also, I ran out of disk space during make install, so I can't upload...
> :-(
Never mind, got creative with debfoster and freed a bit of space. It's
in incoming. Final patch against pristine source is attached.
Zeen,
-Adam P.
GPG fingerpr
reopen 271645
retitle 271645 FTBFS: excessive memory use makes autobuild impossible
tags 271645 +patch
thanks
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:17, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Hey, that worked! Now, how to dig in and try to get that one file to
> > compile with -O0 during the bui
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hey, that worked! Now, how to dig in and try to get that one file to
compile with -O0 during the build...
Hint: you can override CFLAGS etc in makefiles on a per-target basis.
The info pages describe it under "info make Target-specific" or see
http://www.gnu.org/software/
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 13:05, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > There's something wrong here, either a g++ bug or a package bug. I
> > don't see how a 58K .cpp file is taking that much memory to compile,
> > when nothing else in the package seemed to take more than 30-40 MB.
>
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 12:22, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 17:31, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 08:11, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> >> > [I'm CCing debian-arm, as hopefully someone there can trigger zinf to
> >>
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
There's something wrong here, either a g++ bug or a package bug. I
don't see how a 58K .cpp file is taking that much memory to compile,
when nothing else in the package seemed to take more than 30-40 MB.
It often depends on the optimisation settings, or the use of templated
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 17:31, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 08:11, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
>> > [I'm CCing debian-arm, as hopefully someone there can trigger zinf to
>> > be rebuilt on an ARM machine with more RAM - see [0] for deta
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 17:31, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 08:11, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> > [I'm CCing debian-arm, as hopefully someone there can trigger zinf to
> > be rebuilt on an ARM machine with more RAM - see [0] for details. ]
> >
> > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 08:11, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> [I'm CCing debian-arm, as hopefully someone there can trigger zinf to
> be rebuilt on an ARM machine with more RAM - see [0] for details. ]
>
> [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271645&repeatmerged=no
>
> As pointed out al
[I'm CCing debian-arm, as hopefully someone there can trigger zinf to
be rebuilt on an ARM machine with more RAM - see [0] for details. ]
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271645&repeatmerged=no
As pointed out already, this is not a package bug, but the buildd in
question had
10 matches
Mail list logo