On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> So add me to your list. I run four Seagate DockStar (v5) and two
> Raspberry Pi (v6, first generation). Although bout the latter, I was
> hoping for a "arm6hf" port and used armel until then. But with more
> recent Pi models AFAIK being arm
Steve McIntyre wrote...
> First released with Lenny, supports ARMv4t & later. QNAS etc. kirkwood
> & some freedombox. Toolchain and kernel support upstream are probably
> never going away due to the massive number of simple ARM devices still
> being made and shipped, however...
Quite recently I s
On September 14, 2015 12:45:03 PM GMT+02:00, JM wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Steve McIntyre
>wrote:
>>
>> Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make
>> noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported
>> in future.
>>
>
>I'm running Debian o
This is microATX with 2 Gbe, 210Gbe and 4 SATA III ports. :
http://www.eteknix.com/latest-gigabyte-microatx-motherboard-arrives-with-octo-core-armv8-soc/
which is actually on-sale:
http://www.ldlc.com/fiche/PB00191584.html
But it's server kit so it's 950 EUR.
Wookey
Good to know that there
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 15:31 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Lucy Wayland wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:55:38PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:58 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > > Does this issue go away entirely if we move from a v4t to
> SWP and SWPB - these were deprecated in ARMv7 but absent in ARMv8.
If I am not mistaken, these were deprecated in ARMv6 already, and they
are optional in ARMv7:
http://www.google.com/search?q=swp+swpb+armv6+armv7
The QNAP things that people seem keen not to lose support for are ARMv5TE.
+++ Paul Wise [2015-09-14 15:31 +0200]:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Lucy Wayland wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:55:38PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:58 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Does this issue go away entirely if we move from a v4t to v5 base, or
>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Lucy Wayland wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:55:38PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:58 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Does this issue go away entirely if we move from a v4t to v5 base, or
>> are there also v5 instructions which are (pote
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 03:55:38PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:58 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Does this issue go away entirely if we move from a v4t to v5 base, or
> are there also v5 instructions which are (potentially) absent in v8? (I
> think so, but I don't have my
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make
> noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported
> in future.
>
I'm running Debian on QNAP TS-212P that was purchased new three months
ago. I recomme
Although I'm quite new to Linux I was able to setup jessy on a new QNAP
TS-420U (... many thanks to tbm and the list)
and it would be great if kirkwood devices would get support also in the
future.
If (for whatever reason) this is not possible ... I hope that (at least)
some kind of LTS will be
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make
> noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported
> in future.
>
I'd hate to see my two QNAP NAS:es unsupported. Setting them up again with
new hardwar
+++ Philippe Clérié [2015-09-13 20:14 -0400]:
> On 09/11/2015 11:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> >Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make
> >noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported
> >in future.
> >
>
> Thanks for that post. Very timely, as
On 09/11/2015 11:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make
noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported
in future.
Thanks for that post. Very timely, as I was about to recommend some QNAP
hardware because of armel
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 23:26 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Ian Campbell [2015-09-12 15:55 +0100]:
>
> > The other two subarches in the kernel are orion5x and versatile. I
> have
> > no personal interest in either. My gut suggests that orion5x (the
> > Marvell variant prior to kirkwood) is the one peop
+++ Ian Campbell [2015-09-12 15:55 +0100]:
> The other two subarches in the kernel are orion5x and versatile. I have
> no personal interest in either. My gut suggests that orion5x (the
> Marvell variant prior to kirkwood) is the one people might more
> plausibly still be interested in, but I don't
At Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:58:42 +0100,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make
> noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported
> in future.
I think it would be a pity if we wouldn't support kirkwoord devices
such as those QNAP
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 16:58 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> armel
> =
>
> [...]
> Known worries/issues:
>
> * Kernel size due to very restrictive flash space; has been a
>problem, but not believed to be affecting current users so much
>now. Several problematic sub-arches have been dr
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
As promised, here's a quick summary of what was discussed at the BoF
session in Heidelberg. Apologies for the delay - it takes a while to
write these up, especially when struck down with the traditional
post-DebConf plague. :-(
Thanks to the
19 matches
Mail list logo
