Re: STOP THE PRESSES Re: XFree86 4.0.2-12 release and architecture status

2001-03-29 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in > debian-devel. Installing gcc 2.95.3-9 makes things suitable for building on i386

Re: STOP THE PRESSES Re: XFree86 4.0.2-12 release and architecture status

2001-03-28 Thread Philip Blundell
Branden Robinson wrote: >So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version, >but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you >have to build for a while. There will be a 4.0.2-13. Since medusa had already spent 23 hours or so grinding away at -12, I

STOP THE PRESSES Re: XFree86 4.0.2-12 release and architecture status

2001-03-28 Thread Branden Robinson
[sorry for the wide CC; please note the Reply-To header] Predictably, my efforts to create a synchonization point for XFree86 blew up in my face. So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version, but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you hav