* Carl Fredricksen [2010-06-27 20:03]:
how did you solve this issue? I have exactly the same problem after
recovering the TS-119, updating with the current image and now trying
to flash debian. It seems that the correct MAC address is already in
place.
It seems that the MAC address is not
* Carl Fredricksen [2010-06-27 20:03]:
> how did you solve this issue? I have exactly the same problem after
> recovering the TS-119, updating with the current image and now trying
> to flash debian. It seems that the correct MAC address is already in
> place.
It seems that the MAC address is not
Hello,
how did you solve this issue? I have exactly the same problem after
recovering the TS-119, updating with the current image and now trying
to flash debian. It seems that the correct MAC address is already in
place.
Kind regards,
Carl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.d
Problem solved, it has to do with some differences in used U-boot
loader version and use of recovery mode.
@Martin, thanks for your help in solving this.
--
Epco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
* Martin Michlmayr [2010-05-16 15:34]:
> You're the second person with this problem this week. The problem is
> that 00:00:00:00:05:09 is not the MAC address your device should have.
> It should start with 00:08:9B.
For the record, I've identified the root cause of this problem.
I'll post a summ
* Epco Dijk [2010-05-16 10:56]:
> [/tmp] # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:05:09
You're the second person with this problem this week. The problem is
that 00:00:00:00:05:09 is not the MAC address your device should have.
It should start with 00:08:9B.
My investigati
6 matches
Mail list logo
