Ross Burton wrote:
> I've been using this kernel for some time on my N2100 now, and the
> improvement in disk IO performance is substantial. I'd love to see this
> merged into lenny's kernel but I realise I should have sent this email a
> few weeks ago for that to be in any way possible...
hedges
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 22:37 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Markus Lindenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 12:58]:
> > i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
> > limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
> > core purpose, being a high
* Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 13:57]:
> imho, it's not only a matter of having someone from the community
> working on that. iirc, the patches were not really well perceived when
> sent to l-a-k. There was some "hey' don't do that" but nobody helped in
> finding a way to solve the
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> * Uwe Holz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 10:17]:
>> is there any estimation, when changes will touch base in a regular
>> kernel release?
>
> Probably not soon, if ever. These patches don't appear to be high
> priority for Intel, especially no
* Uwe Holz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 10:17]:
> is there any estimation, when changes will touch base in a regular
> kernel release?
Probably not soon, if ever. These patches don't appear to be high
priority for Intel, especially now that the IOP32x chip will reach its
end of life at the end
Hi,
is there any estimation, when changes will touch base in a regular kernel
release?
Regards
Uwe
On 11 Mai, 23:20, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 02:43]:
>
> > MM> Still no progress, but I just made 2.6.25 kernels available with
* Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 02:43]:
> MM> Still no progress, but I just made 2.6.25 kernels available with
> MM> the DMA patches applied.
> Can you publish source package too, to make it easier to build the
> kernel for armel?
Download the linux-2.6 source from unstable (*)
Twas brillig at 22:37:21 09.05.2008 UTC+02 when Martin Michlmayr did gyre and
gimble:
MM> Still no progress, but I just made 2.6.25 kernels available with
MM> the DMA patches applied.
Can you publish source package too, to make it easier to build the
kernel for armel?
--
pgpDltT0UGkaz.pgp
* Markus Lindenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 12:58]:
> i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
> limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
> core purpose, being a high performance nas device in a gbit lan. even my
> slug seems to have
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:56]:
Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
Could you send me your .config for N2100?
I've attached a config file, but basically, you just need to enable
the DMA engine and the options that the pat
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:56]:
>> Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
> Could you send me your .config for N2100?
I've attached a config file, but basically, you just need to enable
the DMA engine and the options that the patches add.
--
Martin Mich
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:36]:
Last time I tried those patches on N4100, which should be similar,
(2.6.23-iop series, and every earlier release) disk performance was
still very poor.
Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:36]:
> Last time I tried those patches on N4100, which should be similar,
> (2.6.23-iop series, and every earlier release) disk performance was
> still very poor.
Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 13:23]:
Are these patches the same as those on
http://sf.net/projects/xscaleiop or is it something different?
Yeah, the patches are in there. Also look for Dan William's mail to
linux-arm-kernel a few weeks ago whe
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> * Markus Lindenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 12:58]:
>> i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
>> limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
>> core purpose, being a high performance
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 13:23]:
> Are these patches the same as those on
> http://sf.net/projects/xscaleiop or is it something different?
Yeah, the patches are in there. Also look for Dan William's mail to
linux-arm-kernel a few weeks ago where he submitted the DMA re
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Markus Lindenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 12:58]:
i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
core purpose, being a high performance nas device in a gbit lan. even m
* Markus Lindenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 12:58]:
> i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
> limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
> core purpose, being a high performance nas device in a gbit lan. even my
> slug seems to have
Hi,
i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very
limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's
core purpose, being a high performance nas device in a gbit lan. even my
slug seems to have a better disk performance.
i know i could go back to thecus fir
19 matches
Mail list logo
