Diederik de Haas dijo [Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:01:59PM +0100]:
> Personally I think it's more useful if Hank reported the issue himself to
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/ then let Gunnar do it on his behalf.
I agree with you, Diederik. I think Hank has a better grasp of the
problems he
I tested this morning with an install on an SD card and the disk benchmarks
were not significantly different. The updated `raspi-firmware` did seem to
result in slightly slower performance (7188 events before and 6525 after)
but I attribute this to a low CPU clock rather than a problem with the SD
On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 13:32:37 CET Hank Barta wrote:
> Some additional information that might be useful is that the system seems
> unable to determine CPU frequencies. For example
>
> root@up:~# cpupower frequency-info
> analyzing CPU 0:
> no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
>
Some additional information that might be useful is that the system seems
unable to determine CPU frequencies. For example
root@up:~# cpupower frequency-info
analyzing CPU 0:
no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: Not Available
CPUs
On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 05:20:02 CET Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Given you have already pursued the situation to this detail, could you
> share... between which versions do you see the regression?
raspi-firmware/testing 1.20220120+ds-1 arm64 [upgradable from: 1.20210805+ds-1]
signature.asc
Description
Hank Barta dijo [Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 09:31:36PM -0500]:
> I started installing packages I thought were likely to cause the regression
> (one or two at a time) and following installation of raspi-firmware the
> problem appeared.
As the maintainer of raspi-firmware, I have to say:
Ouch.
rasp
I started installing packages I thought were likely to cause the regression
(one or two at a time) and following installation of raspi-firmware the
problem appeared.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:35 PM Hank Barta wrote:
> First of all, many many thanks for making Debian work on a Raspberry Pi
> 4B.
First of all, many many thanks for making Debian work on a Raspberry Pi 4B.
I bounce back and forth between Bullseye and Bookworm on a Pi 4B and have
noticed a performance degradation with Bookworm.
TL;DR
Install (current) Bookworm - performance good.
apt update/upgrade - performance tanks.
Rever
8 matches
Mail list logo
