Oh right, yeah. I see. In that case there probably isn't much point
filing bugs, except possibly for the cyberpro2000 thing.
The idea is that the prepackaged kernels should work well enough that
people aren't obliged to build their own if they don't want to.
Practically speaking, I suspect that
It is better because it doesn't include a whole bunch of modules
which can never work on a netwinder, is about 1/3 the size of
the standard one, and it realizes the full potential of the
Netwinder cyberpro2000 framebuffer. I could probably file a
bug, but I have never used stock debian kernels ever
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 11:07, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> I have a custom kernel-headers deb package for 2.4.16
> on my web page http://webpages.charter.net/bdhilton/arm.html
> but I am not a Debian developer (yet) and I just made it for my
> Netwinder. I made it with make-kpkg, and it is a lot bette
I have a custom kernel-headers deb package for 2.4.16
on my web page http://webpages.charter.net/bdhilton/arm.html
but I am not a Debian developer (yet) and I just made it for my
Netwinder. I made it with make-kpkg, and it is a lot better
than the default debian netwinder kernel.
I can try to build
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 04:05, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=uml-utilities&ver=20020320-2&arch=arm&stamp=1017873267&file=log&as=raw
>
> uml-utilities has built successfully everywhere except ARM; the problem
> seems to be old or lacking kernel headers. Is there any
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=uml-utilities&ver=20020320-2&arch=arm&stamp=1017873267&file=log&as=raw
uml-utilities has built successfully everywhere except ARM; the problem
seems to be old or lacking kernel headers. Is there any way to get it built
with different kernel headers, or do I
6 matches
Mail list logo
