On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 02:18, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> So that would seem to make for two RC bugs: one against gcc-2.95 for
> these LC* mystery symbols in fortran libs, and the other against
> gcc-3.0_3.0.3-1 for not building, right?
I think I looked at fixing this in 2.95 a long time ago and di
Philip Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 16:28, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
/usr/lib/liblapack.so: undefined reference to `LC13'
It's a compiler bug. Try gcc-3.0, and/or file a bug report.
[This was while trying to build illuminator.] Okay... Unfortunately,
3.0.3 has never successfully built on
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 16:28, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> /usr/lib/liblapack.so: undefined reference to `LC13'
It's a compiler bug. Try gcc-3.0, and/or file a bug report.
p.
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:28:50AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I'm trying to build illuminator, which is based on PETSc, which in turn
uses BLAS and LAPACK. But when I go to link a binary executable against
these libs, I get:
/usr/lib/liblapack.so: undefined referen
Greetings,
I'm trying to build illuminator, which is based on PETSc, which in turn
uses BLAS and LAPACK. But when I go to link a binary executable against
these libs, I get:
gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/chts chts.o cahnhill.o
-L/usr/lib/petsc/lib/libO/linux -lpetscts -lpetscsnes -lpetscsles
-L/usr/li
5 matches
Mail list logo
