On Sat 2007-12-29 11:27:34 -0500, Florent Fourcot wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
>>
>> armel is not an officially supported architecture yet, so it has its
>> own archive server.
>
> Yes I know, and there is not mirror with 2.6.23 for armel ? I was
> surprised by the answer of Daniel.
Ah, s
* Florent Fourcot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-29 17:27]:
> > armel is not an officially supported architecture yet, so it has its
> > own archive server.
> Yes I know, and there is not mirror with 2.6.23 for armel ? I was
> surprised by the answer of Daniel.
Quoting Riku Voipio from #455909:
> >
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
>
> armel is not an officially supported architecture yet, so it has its
> own archive server.
Yes I know, and there is not mirror with 2.6.23 for armel ? I was
surprised by the answer of Daniel.
>
> BTW, out of interest, is the NS04-4110 you mentioned the Intel
> SS
* Florent Fourcot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-29 16:50]:
> # apt-get update
> [...]
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/dists/sid/Release Unable to find
> expected entry main/binary-armel/Packages in Meta-index file (malformed
> Release file?)
>
> And it's true, there are not reference of armel
Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit :
> On Fri 2007-12-28 17:57:46 -0500, Florent Fourcot wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem with a processor IOP 80219 on a NS04-4110. But I
>> use an armel mirror, kernel 2.6.23 is unfortunately not avaible, not in
>> unstable packages.
>
> fwiw, the new kernel is avail
On Fri 2007-12-28 17:57:46 -0500, Florent Fourcot wrote:
> I have the same problem with a processor IOP 80219 on a NS04-4110. But I
> use an armel mirror, kernel 2.6.23 is unfortunately not avaible, not in
> unstable packages.
fwiw, the new kernel is available for me with the following repo:
0 i
6 matches
Mail list logo
