Hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 7:21 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while investigating a test failure in ksh93u+m, it became clear that
> packages last built before the time_t-64bit transition can have
> latent bugs.
> They might very well now FTBFS or fail at runtime (autopkgtest time
> o
On 2024-08-16 10:25, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Martin, I think you and your employer were looking for ways to help the
> armhf/armel ports. This looks like a great one! :)
Noted ;-)
[ Martin added to CC ]
On 2024-08-16 12:02, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> while investigating a test failure in ksh93u+m, it became clear that
> packages last built before the time_t-64bit transition can have
> latent bugs.
> They might very well now FTBFS or fail at runtime (autopkgtest time
> or l
Hi,
while investigating a test failure in ksh93u+m, it became clear that
packages last built before the time_t-64bit transition can have
latent bugs.
They might very well now FTBFS or fail at runtime (autopkgtest time
or later).
I believe FTBFS are bugs are probably caught by periodic rebuilds
do
4 matches
Mail list logo
