Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > You'll most likely still want to target GLES rather than desktop GL... I'm wondering why when mesa supports both, I guess this is so that Qt apps work with existing working proprietary GLES drivers? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/Pa

Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:46:06 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Correct. It is rare to find accelerated OpenGL drivers for ARM; almost all > > the drivers out there, particularly for recent hardware, will be GLES2 > > instead. > > That is

Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Correct. It is rare to find accelerated OpenGL drivers for ARM; almost all > the drivers out there, particularly for recent hardware, will be GLES2 > instead. That is changing slowly, Qualcomm Adreno GPUs are apparently now supported by me

Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Thank you all for your fast replies! -- You don’t marry someone you can live with – you marry the person who you cannot live without. Anonymous Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:43:42 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > Correct. It is rare to find accelerated OpenGL drivers for ARM; > almost all the drivers out there, particularly for recent hardware, > will be GLES2 instead. This means that any reasonably GL-intensive > app is going to be unusable, par

Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Lisandro, On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:10:25PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! I'm trying to find a solution for the FTBFS of qantenna on arm* [0][1] > that fits the best to everyone. This issue seems to be very similar to a > older > thread "including both GL/gl.h and

Re: GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 15:10:25 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! I'm trying to find a solution for the FTBFS of qantenna on arm* [0][1] > that fits the best to everyone. This issue seems to be very similar to a > older > thread "including both GL/gl.h and cogl/cogl.h fa

GL/gl.h, Qt5 and arm: FTBFS

2014-03-24 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! I'm trying to find a solution for the FTBFS of qantenna on arm* [0][1] that fits the best to everyone. This issue seems to be very similar to a older thread "including both GL/gl.h and cogl/cogl.h fails on armel and armhf" [2], but I failed to see how that was resolved. The FTBFSs are due t