Hey guys,
I did not understand these whole low-level technical details(when
reading the original thread in the archives I just don't get it, sorry),
but when I hear "Java on ARM" it might be interesting that the people
from the jalimo project build packages of different JVM's for the maemo
platfor
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:35:41PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Riku Voipio writes:
> > Due to the amount of core libraries and tools building java bindings,
> > this is pretty much the top technical roadblock[1] on current debian
> > arm eabi port.
> Interesting. My usual reponse to this is "
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > > I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
> > > > bothered: the real fix for this is EABI.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the EABI won't fix this either. In its native form i
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
> > > bothered: the real fix for this is EABI.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the EABI won't fix this either. In its native form it
> > supported neither forced unwinding
Riku Voipio writes:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:03:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:53:19PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
> > > bothered: the real fix for this is EABI.
>
> > Unfortunately, the EAB
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:53:19PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
No he didn't. I did.
> > I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
> > bothered: the real fix for this is EABI.
>
> Unfortunately, the EABI won't fix this either. In its native form it
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:03:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:53:19PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
> > bothered: the real fix for this is EABI.
> Unfortunately, the EABI won't fix this either. In its nativ
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:53:19PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
> bothered: the real fix for this is EABI.
Unfortunately, the EABI won't fix this either. In its native form it
supported neither forced unwinding nor _Unwind_Backtrace; we adde
Peter Naulls wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the n2100 support both OABI and EABI? If so, maybe someone should
put chroots for both on hedges?
Any ARM processor made in the last 10 years or so will do EABI. Of
course, you
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the n2100 support both OABI and EABI? If so, maybe someone should
> put chroots for both on hedges?
Any ARM processor made in the last 10 years or so will do EABI. Of
course, you'll need a modern kernel wit
Wookey wrote:
Good news on the java front thanks to sterling efforts by aph. This
still needs merging back into the debian packaging.
- Forwarded message from Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
I can work around some of the failures, but I can't really be
bothered: the real fix for thi
Good news on the java front thanks to sterling efforts by aph. This
still needs merging back into the debian packaging.
- Forwarded message from Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:43:00 +0100
To: Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
12 matches
Mail list logo
