On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:29:12PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> We have to start somewhere, however. Having equipment on which to build, is a
> good start. I'll let the release team and the buildd team decide what to
> build, when and where. My goal is meet the supportability / reliability
> r
>>Generally speaking, our requirements for equipment to be used as
>>buildd/porter
>> machines are as follows:
>>
>> * reliability - The stable release manager requires that we operate
>> three machines for each port: two buildd machines in different
>> locations and one porter machine. These
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 17:16 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
> > Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
> > debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
> > and have specific cust
Hello,
2013/6/27 Luca Filipozzi :
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> > My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
>> > for development purposes means that we don't have easy
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 05:16:11PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I am of course not in any way official Debian anything, just a long time
> user of Debian on many architectures and machine types, but I think I
> have a decent understanding of how things work.
We have to start somewhere, however
Hello David,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Would http://packages.debian.org/jessie/linux-image-3.9-1-vexpress by
> any chance be a valid kernel image for the highbank? I see in the git
> logs of Linus's tree that there is a v7 multiplatform config that is
> supposed to cover the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
> > for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
> > testing for example ker
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
> Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
> debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
> and have specific customers who would really love to see debian working on
> ours/calxeda
> My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
> for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
> testing for example kernel upgrades.
Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform. We
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:30:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > The impression I got during the brief from the arm porters is that it is
> > so far unclear how well Debian will run on this nice shiney thing.
> > So for now it's
Hello,
2013/4/26 Raphael Hertzog :
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote:
>> * DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could
>> export accounts if requested.
>> * Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to
>> build official packages.
> Did you g
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 10:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > > > Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > > Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> > > reject the offer, it makes it very interesting
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> To be a useful porter machine, it would be nice if all DD can have access
> to it. But if it's not administrated by DSA, I don't know if the newly
> announced self-served chroot service can be setup on this machine.
Neither of these require the machin
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> > reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a playground
> > machine. However, let me make some points here:
>
>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
> > OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> > willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
> Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> rejec
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote:
> * DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could
> export accounts if requested.
> * Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to
> build official packages.
Did you get those answers from the relevant teams? Was
Hector Oron writes:
> Hello,
>
> 2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
>
>> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
>> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
>
> Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> reject the offer, it makes it ver
Hello,
2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a playground
machi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian. I believe it would make a
> relatively fast ARM autobuilder or porter box. The specs of the ha
hi,
On Fr, 2013-04-12 at 17:16 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian. I believe it would make a
> relatively fast ARM autobuilder or porter box. The specs of the hardwa
Hello,
OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian. I believe it would make a
relatively fast ARM autobuilder or porter box. The specs of the hardware (4GB
RAM, 500 GB SATA drives, 4 Cortex A9 cores at 1.1 to 1.4 GHz) a
22 matches
Mail list logo
