Joey Hess wrote:
> Riku Voipio wrote:
>> - Debian-installer lenny
>>
>> I'm not quite sure where we are with armel lenny d-i. Can someone
>> fill me in?
>
> armel needs to be usable in testing before it can be released with a d-i
> beta or release candidate. However, the daily built images work f
Riku Voipio wrote:
> - Debian-installer lenny
>
> I'm not quite sure where we are with armel lenny d-i. Can someone
> fill me in?
armel needs to be usable in testing before it can be released with a d-i
beta or release candidate. However, the daily built images work fine,
provided you install uns
Just a little mail to co-ordinate activities with armel port atm:
- Buildd's
5 buildd's (all thecus n2100 based) running. I'm setting up
the 6th while writing this. I'm optimistic that these should
be enough for the time being. Testing-proposed-updates and
testing-security building should start b
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007, Wookey wrote:
>> [...]
>> > As mentioned earlier, I m mildly busy, so I can't work on
>> > everything. Thus I call for help.
>> > http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiTodo and #debian-arm on
>> > irc.debian.org are used as communication channel. Instead of
>> > updating the wiki agai
On 2007-11-01 23:40 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> = Where is armel port today =
>
> Buildd's are running fine, and more and more packages get
> built properly. However, there is not much development going on
> or pushing to get it included officially.
>
> - Armel port keeps between 90-91% upto date
On 2007-11-01 23:43 +, Wookey wrote:
> On 2007-11-01 23:40 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > = Where is armel port today =
> > == Developer machine ==
> >
> > I believe Wookey was working on this - any news?
>
> Yes. I updated http://wiki.debian.org/armelLennyReleaseRecertification
> yesterday wi
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 11:08:23AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Is the arm distribution kernel for the n2100 armel-capable? Could we
> install an armel chroot on hedges, and have it serve as a buildd for
> both arm and armel?
No, but the other way around is possible - arm chroot with a armel
ke
Wookey wrote:
On 2007-11-01 23:40 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
= Where is armel port today =
== Developer machine ==
I believe Wookey was working on this - any news?
Yes. I updated http://wiki.debian.org/armelLennyReleaseRecertification
yesterday with some info.
A machine (500Mhz 384MB
On 2007-11-01 23:40 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> = Where is armel port today =
> == Developer machine ==
>
> I believe Wookey was working on this - any news?
Yes. I updated http://wiki.debian.org/armelLennyReleaseRecertification
yesterday with some info.
A machine (500Mhz 384MB balloon3 with 250G
= Where is armel port today =
Buildd's are running fine, and more and more packages get
built properly. However, there is not much development going on
or pushing to get it included officially.
- Armel port keeps between 90-91% upto date. This is about the same
level as m68k port. The largest mis
10 matches
Mail list logo
