Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-10-18 Thread Wookey
On Tue 12 Sep, Jim Pick wrote: > Hi, > > The debian-arm webpage is in a horrible non-maintained state (I last > updated on January 20, 1999). > > http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ > > It makes the whole port look like it's dead, which it obviously isn't.

Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-26 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK Jim, I'm back from hols and I'm happy to do this. I see no-one else has > > fixed it yet. Were there any other volunteers? > > Hi, > > Both Chris Rutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Peter Naulls > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-26 Thread Jim Pick
Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue 12 Sep, Jim Pick wrote: > > Hi, > > > The debian-arm webpage is in a horrible non-maintained state (I last > > updated on January 20, 1999). > > > http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ > > > It ma

Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-26 Thread Wookey
On Tue 12 Sep, Jim Pick wrote: > Hi, > The debian-arm webpage is in a horrible non-maintained state (I last > updated on January 20, 1999). > http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ > It makes the whole port look like it's dead, which it obviously isn't. > Does any

Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-12 Thread Jim Pick
Hi, The debian-arm webpage is in a horrible non-maintained state (I last updated on January 20, 1999). http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ It makes the whole port look like it's dead, which it obviously isn't. Does anybody want to redo it? I'd really like somebody to voluntee