Re: Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Philip Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:58, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Just got and reinstalled the deb, it's still an empty directory. Any ideas? Try uninstalling libc6-dev, deleting the empty directories, and reinstalling the package. I don't know how the situation arose in the firs

Re: Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-12 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:58, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Just got and reinstalled the deb, it's still an empty directory. > > Any ideas? Try uninstalling libc6-dev, deleting the empty directories, and reinstalling the package. I don't know how the situation arose in the first place, though - might

Re: Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Philip Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 18:32, Adam C Powell IV wrote: # ls /usr/include/asm/arch nothing. But /usr/include/param.h starts with: #ifndef __ASM_PARAM_H #define __ASM_PARAM_H #include /* for HZ */ and that file is nonexistent... Trying to include sys/param.h in C source

Re: Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-12 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 18:32, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > # ls /usr/include/asm/arch > > nothing. But /usr/include/param.h starts with: > > #ifndef __ASM_PARAM_H > #define __ASM_PARAM_H > > #include /* for HZ */ > > and that file is nonexistent... Trying to include sys/param.h in C > source

Re: Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Philip Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 19:47, Adam C Powell IV wrote: I'm wondering what's up with this bug. The libc6-dev released with woody (-6) was fine, as is the new woody version (-10). But the first unstable release (-7) was bad (see subject above, or the bug), and the latest

Re: Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-09 Thread Philip Blundell
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 19:47, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > I'm wondering what's up with this bug. The libc6-dev released with > woody (-6) was fine, as is the new woody version (-10). But the first > unstable release (-7) was bad (see subject above, or the bug), and the > latest unstable is too (-

Bug 151669: empty /usr/include/asm/arch

2002-08-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi, I'm wondering what's up with this bug. The libc6-dev released with woody (-6) was fine, as is the new woody version (-10). But the first unstable release (-7) was bad (see subject above, or the bug), and the latest unstable is too (-13). Both woody and unstable show 2.4.16 in /usr/include