Re: Bug#933101: buster: baseline for armel raised to ARMv5T

2019-08-25 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 25 aug 19, 21:27:49, Paul Gevers wrote: > > On 27-07-2019 07:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Below a patch for the Release Notes, loosely inspired from the s390x > > entry. > > > > Feedback very much welcome, especially whether this is > > an ISA bump (Wikipedia mentions them as "Microarchi

Re: Bug#933101: buster: baseline for armel raised to ARMv5T

2019-08-25 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Andrei, On 27-07-2019 07:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Below a patch for the Release Notes, loosely inspired from the s390x > entry. > > Feedback very much welcome, especially whether this is > an ISA bump (Wikipedia mentions them as "Microarchitectures"[1]). > > > diff --git a/en/issues.dbk

Re: Bug#933101: buster: baseline for armel raised to ARMv5T

2019-07-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
Control: tags patch On Vi, 26 iul 19, 21:11:46, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Vi, 26 iul 19, 19:29:26, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > The raise to ARMv5T was necessary to keep armel supported. It wouldn't have > > been > > possible to keep the port if had let it at ARMv4T. > > Wikipedia

Bug#933101: buster: baseline for armel raised to ARMv5T

2019-07-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
Package: release-notes Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Full quote for context. On Vi, 26 iul 19, 19:29:26, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Dick! > > On 7/26/19 7:13 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > > The website says that you are supporting 4T in the ARMEL repo: >