Version: 1.24.1+dfsg1-1+b1
Seems to be working well, 1.25 compiled on armel several times with no issues,
so closing.
X
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 03/03/18 09:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have managed to build rustc 1.24 natively on armel using the changes from
>> the f
On 03/03/18 09:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have managed to build rustc 1.24 natively on armel using the changes from
> the following bug reports:
>
> - #891022 - rustc: Please include patch to disable kernel helpers on armel
> - #891913 - rustc: Please add architecture ma
Hi!
I have managed to build rustc 1.24 natively on armel using the changes from
the following bug reports:
- #891022 - rustc: Please include patch to disable kernel helpers on armel
- #891913 - rustc: Please add architecture matching for armel =>
armv5te-unknown-linux-gnu
- #891961 - rustc
Ximin Luo:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>> On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that
ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:37 +, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > >> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream clai
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that
>>> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were
>>> only introduc
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 19:21 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that
> >> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current know
On 11/15/2017 07:16 PM, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that
>> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were
>> only introduced with ARMv7.
>
> ARMv6 has 32-
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 18:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> As for the atomics: What strikes me odd is that upstream claims that
> ARMv6 is supported. But to my current knowledge, proper atomics were
> only introduced with ARMv7.
ARMv6 has 32-bit atomics (LDREX and STREX instructions), a
On 11/15/2017 06:33 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> There are no old build logs for rustc/armel, but IIRC atomics were broken
> on libstdc++/armel for a while, but that got fixed. Not sure if that's
> related to this; maybe the maintainers or the armel porters can take a
> look with a recent ve
Source: rustc
Version: 1.21.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: important
Hi,
rustc is missing on armel. I asked sometime ago about its status:
17:08 < infinity0> pochu_: armel isn't supported because of lack of proper
atomics in llvm, it is theoreticaly possible but noone has spent the effort
There are no ol
11 matches
Mail list logo
