OK, I will do that.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2013/5/7 Ben Hutchings :
> I've updated the trunk branch in svn for Linux 3.9, so please go ahead
> with this.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> If God had intended Man to program,
> we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
I've updated the trunk branch in svn for Linux 3.9, so please go ahead
with this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If God had intended Man to program,
we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2013/4/2 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
>
>> Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
>> Which do you like?
>> if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
>
> armmp ++
Thanks!
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu
Hello,
2013/4/2 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
> Which do you like?
> if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
armmp ++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi, all.
Now, we are trying to determine the MP flavor of ARM in Debian.
Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
Which do you like?
if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
Best,
Nobuhiro
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Thu, Ma
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:42:49AM +, Tixy wrote:
> A single multiplatform kernel can support both armv6 and armv7 (or armv4
> + armv5). I don't know if Debian plans to have separate versions for
> each architecture version - there may be performance benefits to this -
> in which case using arm
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 12:52 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be.
> >> Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$F
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be.
>> Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$FLAVOUR.
>
> Woops, I missed that uname -r includes the flavour bit.
>
>> I
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:44 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>> I already commented some days ago on debian-arm that currently
>> multiplatform support must wait. It is useless as usb support is
>> _broken_ on multiplatform. Hopefully, Linaro devs
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be.
> Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$FLAVOUR.
Woops, I missed that uname -r includes the flavour bit.
> I think there is an argument for making the multiplatform case be th
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction
> > in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU
> > requirement like the flavours for s
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:03 +, Tixy wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings
> > > wrote:
> > [...]
>
> > > > In future all ARM kernels should be mult
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 08:44 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> I already commented some days ago on debian-arm that currently
> multiplatform support must wait. It is useless as usb support is
> _broken_ on multiplatform. Hopefully, Linaro devs seem back to work
> and looks like we may have a patch merg
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction
> in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU
> requirement like the flavours for some other architectures.
How about the same scheme as on othe
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > In future all ARM kernels should be multi-platform, but I expect there
> > > will still be different
Ben Hutchings writes:
Hi,
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your comment.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> >> Package: linux
>> >> Version: 3.
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >> Package: linux
> >> Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
> >> Severity: wis
Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> Package: linux
>> Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: patch
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >From linux 3.8, support of armada 370/xp
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:35 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Package: linux
> Version: 3.8.2-1~experimental.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> >From linux 3.8, support of armada 370/xp was added in arm.
> This is classified into the armhf architecture of debian.
> First I began and
19 matches
Mail list logo
