Re: Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf

2022-08-23 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761665 On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 10:27:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Here's the generated file. The build is still going, so I don't know > whether the FTBFS will be reproducible. Looks like yes. I think this is the same issue a

Re: Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf

2022-08-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 10:10:53 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 20:25:54 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > mozjs102 fails to build on armhf > ... > > In function ‘uint64_t js::jit::AtomicCmpXchg64SeqCst(uint64_t*, > > uint64_t, uint64_t)’, > > inlined from ‘static T > > js::j

Re: Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf

2022-08-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 20:25:54 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > mozjs102 fails to build on armhf ... > In function ‘uint64_t js::jit::AtomicCmpXchg64SeqCst(uint64_t*, > uint64_t, uint64_t)’, > inlined from ‘static T > js::jit::AtomicOperations::fetchAndSeqCst(T*, T) [with T = long long > int]’ at

Bug#1017962: mozjs102: Fails to build on armhf

2022-08-22 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: mozjs102 Version: 102.2.0-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Tags: ftbfs help mozjs102 fails to build on armhf. This is a problem because it is blocking us from being able to switch Debian's gjs to use mozjs102 instead of the obsolete mozjs91. https://buildd.d