Re: Auto-builders

2000-07-29 Thread Philip Blundell
>It's possible whatever Frank Smith fixed (`linker segfault') here: > >is one and the same, if this helps. It's hard to tell. There's no obvious sign of any change at all in the source code, and I can't find a copy of the original 2.9.5.0.37 to compare against. p.

Re: Auto-builders

2000-07-28 Thread Chris Rutter
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Philip Blundell wrote: > Sadly, the two aren't related -- even binutils 2.10 has the segfault problem. > > I poked the mozilla build a bit last night and got one green cycle out of it, > but it's lapsed back into redness now. It's possible whatever Frank Smith fixed (`li

Re: Auto-builders

2000-07-27 Thread Philip Blundell
>(He says, noticing binutils 2.10 hasn't made it into woody, and that >the Mozilla builds are failing from a linker segfault.) Sadly, the two aren't related -- even binutils 2.10 has the segfault problem. I poked the mozilla build a bit last night and got one green cycle out of it, but it's lap

Auto-builders

2000-07-23 Thread Chris Rutter
What auto-builders have we got going at the moment, and what type are they? Also, do they feed off frozen, woody, or both? :-) (He says, noticing binutils 2.10 hasn't made it into woody, and that the Mozilla builds are failing from a linker segfault.) c.