Thanx to Bill Gatliff's sterling efforts we now have a machine hosted ready
to become the long-awaited arm developer machine.
Can the admin people please sprinkle the magic LDAP dust, or tell us what
else needs doing first.
thanx
Details as given by bill:
> ssh://leisner.billgatliff.com
>
> Sen
Wookey:
ssh://leisner.billgatliff.com
Send me rsa/dsa keys and I'll add them to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys.
It boots to sarge, feel free to set up chroots for sid et al. as necessary.
I don't have crossdistcc set up yet, give me another day or two. You'll
want that before doing any serious
Wookey:
Wookey wrote:
Yours seems the best offer for the LE machine so please set it up, and tell
this list when it's installed. Any idea when this could happen?
Well, this week is a tough one to get any work done in the USA. :)
Does some time the week of January 2nd work?
That
+++ Bill Gatliff [05-12-20 19:55 -0600]:
> Wookey:
>
> >Yours seems the best offer for the LE machine so please set it up, and tell
> >this list when it's installed. Any idea when this could happen?
> >
> >
>
> Well, this week is a tough one to get any work done in the USA. :)
>
> Does some ti
Wookey:
Yours seems the best offer for the LE machine so please set it up, and tell
this list when it's installed. Any idea when this could happen?
Well, this week is a tough one to get any work done in the USA. :)
Does some time the week of January 2nd work?
Debian machines are traditi
+++ Bill Gatliff [05-12-13 12:17 -0600]:
> Wookey:
>
> Wookey wrote:
>
> >Hi people,
> >
> >Executive summary: Help! What, exactly, does the arm port need to do to
> >make
> >a developer-accessible machine happen?
> >
> >
>
> Just to bolster your case, I still stand ready per our discussion a
Wookey wrote:
>+++ Anthony Towns [05-12-14 22:37 +1000]:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:25:04AM +, Wookey wrote:
>> > I failed to CC you on this orginally and I don't know if you are on
>> > debian-admin or not.
>>
>> I'm not. I spoke with James some more after posting to suggest that one
>> of
+++ Anthony Towns [05-12-14 22:37 +1000]:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:25:04AM +, Wookey wrote:
> > I failed to CC you on this orginally and I don't know if you are on
> > debian-admin or not.
>
> I'm not. I spoke with James some more after posting to suggest that one
> of the arms that Steve
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:25:15PM +, Peter Naulls wrote:
> Much as I don't want to muddy what's clearly already a complex issue,
> you might want to take a look at the latest QEMU developments - CVS,
> not the latest release.
>
> This allows a full ARM system to be run under emulation at very
Wookey wrote:
Hi people,
Executive summary: Help! What, exactly, does the arm port need to do to make
a developer-accessible machine happen?
the long version:
As you know arm has not had a developer-accessible machine available to devs
for quite some time.
Various people have volunteered har
Wookey wrote:
Hi people,
Executive summary: Help! What, exactly, does the arm port need to do to make
a developer-accessible machine happen?
the long version:
As you know arm has not had a developer-accessible machine available to devs
for quite some time.
Various people have volunteered har
Wookey:
Wookey wrote:
Hi people,
Executive summary: Help! What, exactly, does the arm port need to do to make
a developer-accessible machine happen?
Just to bolster your case, I still stand ready per our discussion a
couple of weeks ago to donate a machine to be installed at my co-lo
fa
Hi people,
Executive summary: Help! What, exactly, does the arm port need to do to make
a developer-accessible machine happen?
the long version:
As you know arm has not had a developer-accessible machine available to devs
for quite some time.
Various people have volunteered hardware over the la
13 matches
Mail list logo
