Re: ARM autobuilder problems

2001-03-13 Thread Philip Blundell
By the way, this is what comes out in the .changes file: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:25:05 -0700 > Source: kdrill > Binary: makedic kanadic kdrill > Architecture: arm > Version: 5.10-4 > Distribution: > Urgency: high > Maintainer: ARM Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed-By:

Re: ARM autobuilder problems

2001-03-13 Thread James Troup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Could the appropriate "second in command" for ARM builds, or someone with > the power to do something about it, please email me, so I can get > "kdrill-5.10-4" built under ARM. Err, hello? Stop bugging people about this and _FIX YOUR PACKAGE_. Build-Depends have been

Re: ARM autobuilder problems

2001-03-13 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >He mentioned that the autobuilder is supposed to autodetect a dependancy >on debhelper (if there is no Build-Depends control line), so this can be >viewed as a bug in the autobuilder. Yes, I saw Anthony's mail about that last week. I wasn

ARM autobuilder problems

2001-03-13 Thread phil
HI ARM folks, I tried emailing the official ARM autobuilder contact listed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I just got the bounce notification back. Hopefully, there is someone else on the list who can do something about this. I really need someone's help with this, so my package can make it into "testing"