Re: ARM GPU non-free drivers

2010-11-22 Thread Wookey
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2010-11-22 03:56 +]: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Wookey wrote: > > apologies - subtly and tact have never really been my strong points. Quite. Even amongst other free software peoele not know for their tact you stick out :-) Do try to think for a mom

Re: ARM GPU non-free drivers

2010-11-22 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Arnaud Patard wrote: > David Kuehling writes: > >>> "Luke" == Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: >>>  i know that samsung's S3C6410 GPU engine is being reverse-engineered >>> from two different angles, the linux angle _and_ the wince angle, but >>> i'm seri

Re: ARM GPU non-free drivers

2010-11-22 Thread Rtp
David Kuehling writes: >> "Luke" == Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: >> i know that samsung's S3C6410 GPU engine is being reverse-engineered >> from two different angles, the linux angle _and_ the wince angle, but >> i'm seriously seriously trying to find a decent Cortex A8 CPU with a >

Re: ARM GPU non-free drivers

2010-11-22 Thread David Kuehling
> "Luke" == Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: > i know that samsung's S3C6410 GPU engine is being reverse-engineered > from two different angles, the linux angle _and_ the wince angle, but > i'm seriously seriously trying to find a decent Cortex A8 CPU with a > _remote_ chance of a free so

Re: ARM GPU non-free drivers

2010-11-21 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Wookey wrote: > Luke - you are quite right that free GPU drivers is important, in the > same way that free software in general is important, and that > currently the whole ARM embedded graphics area is a disaster area with > 5 competing implementations _all_ of wh

ARM GPU non-free drivers

2010-11-21 Thread Wookey
In another thread, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2010-11-21 21:11 +]: > >Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > >> apologies for making a copy of the post which was made at > >> forums.arm.com but the last message asking ARM to state their position > >> clearly regarding proprietary and NDA-