On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 02:34:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> maximilian attems dixit:
>
> >I don't know if klibc-utils provided binaries do work on armhf?
>
> In this case, sh and sh.shared don’t work on armhf, either with
> or without thumb. The Debian package builds without thumb.
ok I s
maximilian attems dixit:
>ok I see, thus #634890 has rc severity.
No, last time I’ve thought armhf were RC just because they ended up
being in the main archive I was told off; armhf and s390x still are
not RC. But “we” should process it as if it were RC, probably.
On the other hand, my Latin is
maximilian attems dixit:
>I don't know if klibc-utils provided binaries do work on armhf?
In this case, sh and sh.shared don’t work on armhf, either with
or without thumb. The Debian package builds without thumb.
>(there is a bug report for tegra, but that maybe very specific)
No, that isn’t it
hello,
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> armhf is being one of them, when using klibc to compile mksh-static
> with it.
klibc compiles according to arch overview.
I don't know if klibc-utils provided binaries do work on armhf?
(there is a bug report for tegra, but that maybe very spe
4 matches
Mail list logo
