Re: Y2038 - best way forward in Debian?

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:14:10PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > So, we're all fine? Not so much: for our 32-bit Debian arches, we will > need to basically rebuild the world to be 2038-safe. When we had to do > something like this in the past, to deal with the libc5->libc6 > transition, we had an

Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 08:15:15PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 09:45 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Yes, but that still says: > > Ack. > > > I think a proper procedure should involve a script that: > > > > - is packaged in Debian

Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:19:34AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > One way in which the need to keep armel around would be reduced is if we > > could somehow upgrade from armel machines to armhf ones, without > &g

Re: armel after Stretch (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 08:50:40PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: [...asking for armel to be retained...] One way in which the need to keep armel around would be reduced is if we could somehow upgrade from armel machines to armhf ones, without requiring a reinstall. After all, armel has been around

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

(sorry for jumping in late here) On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:51:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE > > joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to u

Re: Time to change the debian-ports "list"?

Hi, (haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one) On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >>Alexander Wirt dixit: > >> > >>>C

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

On 14-06-13 21:11, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Wouter, Mikael: input on switching C/C++ to 4.8? We don't have much data either way, do we? I suppose it shouldn't be too much of a problem, but I can't be sure. In the past we've usually taken the plunge, and filed bugs if things go really bad. -- Th

Re: mtd errors on boot OpenRD "ultimate" -- but not on "base"

On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:51:11PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > Interestingly, and confusingly... > > I get no such messages on an OpenRD "base" sitting right beside the > "ultimate" running an essentially identical software load. > > Any thoughts? I guess you've got some broken bits in your flas

Re: SS4000E - Disk size limitation?

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:12:42PM +, danny.rodrig...@comcast.net wrote: > I'm not sure if the limitation was hardware based (not sure how it would be) > or > not, but documentation has always stated the unit was designed for 2TB only > (4x500GB) I wrote the installer support on a unit that h

Re: E220 Modem

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:48:37PM +, Brian Platt wrote: > I've been trying for ages to try and get my T-Mobile E220 modem working on my > Linksys NSLU2 but I can't for love nor money and hoping someone on here can > help me, here's some info Perhaps the NSLU2 is just too slow to be able t

Re: Debian Installer for armel ss4000-e

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:28:40PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to use the daily image for the armel installer on > my ss4000-e but running into some issues. > > When I try to upload the .pkg image file to the web interface it > always gets to about 15% then stalls and reb

Re: [jfstrae...@scarlet.be: Re: Some help needed to install Lenny on the Intel SS4000-E nas]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:49:37PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * JF Straeten [2009-07-31 16:45]: > > It leads me to this candid question : are / do the devio commands the > > same things in sid and lenny, or on ARM and AMD64 ? > > I think it should but you can easily test it by creating an i

Re: [jfstrae...@scarlet.be: Re: Some help needed to install Lenny on the Intel SS4000-E nas]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 02:33:17PM +0200, JF Straeten wrote: > Hello Arnaud, > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: > > > For instance : > > load -v -r -b 0x0180 -m ymodem ramdisk > > load -v -r -b 0x01008000 -m ymodem zImage > > exec -c " initrd=0xa180,8M

Re: Some help needed to install Lenny on the Intel SS4000-E nas

y on the Intel SS4000-E nas, thanks to the > > writings of a lot of people (especially Ard Van Bremen, Tobias Frost > > and Martin Michlmayr - many, many thanks to you, by the way, you've > > helped me a lot, even without knowing it !). > > Wouter Verhelst (CCed) has just finished

Re: Is it a bug: huge dependency problems of php5 and ikiwiki

(this really isn't Debian-arm specific; please direct follow-ups, if any, to the debian-user mailinglist) On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 05:11:43PM +0200, Xan wrote: > Hi, > > I have a NSLU2 device (armel computer). With Debian 5.0.2 installed. > I cannot use reportbug because exim4 is not configured pr

Re: Regarding Kirkwood cpu support

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Björn Wetterbom wrote: > What kind of time frames are we talking about when it comes to Debian > support for Kirkwood for us "ordinary users" who don't compile our own > kernels and want our machine to start every day, every time? > > Will initial support

Re: ARM kernel snapshots - 2.6.29-rc7

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:38:18PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Dieter Bloms [2009-03-06 15:19]: > > Is it possible to get a core dump via network or dump it to disc ? > > I don't think so, but maybe someone else has an idea. (There is a > netconsole, but I doubt this'll work in this case.

Re: Architecture usertags

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:22:19AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the > > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the > >

Architecture usertags

Hi, I've often thought that it would be useful to have tags in the BTS so that users or maintainers could mark a bug as specific to a particular architecture. This way, when I have some spare time, I could go to the BTS, fetch a list of bugs that are specific to an architecture I care about, and s

Re: Debian 5.0 armel installation question

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:05:32PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > First trap versatile image is initramfs and not initrd. So I integrated > the cpio archive into my kernel and booted the Debian installer. But it > is really netboot. This is correct; the 'netboot' installer image does not conta

Re: How to find package name of a *.deb file?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:36:29PM -0800, Weidong Li wrote: > Thanks for the info! I tried with your method, and it went pretty fast > in doing the right thing. But then apt-get had a segmentation fault. Please file a bug about that one (if you haven't already) -- Home is where you have to

Re: How to find package name of a *.deb file?

On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 09:15:01AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > [DO NOT Cc me on list replies, and knock off the top-posting] > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:55:36AM -0800, Weidong Li wrote: > > sudo apt-get -d install iceweasel=3.0.5-1 > > > > It downloads files and gives me dependency package

Re: Building zd1211 drivers fore WiFi dongle

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:02:57AM -0700, johncohn wrote: > I then cd'd into /usr/src/modules/zf1211-source and did a 'make' and got > this [...] > SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/zd1211-source modules > make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.18-6-ixp4xx/build: No such file or directory. This means you haven't ins

Re: Building zd1211 drivers fore WiFi dongle

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:41:53PM -0700, johncohn wrote: > Note.. I posted this same query in the nabble nslu2-linux forum. Someone > there suggested I try here as well. tnx > > Folks. > I'm a total newb in both the debian and slug worlds... but I'm already > having a blast... and want to get flu

Re: more ram/swap on leisner, please?

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:28:17PM +0100, David Fokkema wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 21:32 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:17:46PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote: > > > > > >>Ok, I've set up a 5GB swap over NBD. If the system reboots, it won't > > > >>automagically

Re: more ram/swap on leisner, please?

[wearing NBD maintainer hat] On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:00:02PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Guys: > > Ok, I've set up a 5GB swap over NBD. If the system reboots, it won't > automagically reattach it. Did you set the type to 's' in /etc/nbd-client? The nbd initscript should then do the swapon c

Re: FTBFS of apt-cacher-ng on smackdown, maybe broken libstdc++-4.2 installation

Hi Eduard, On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 06:19:47PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=apt-cacher-ng&ver=0.1.9-1&arch=arm&stamp=1197418736&file=log > failed again because if missing libsupc++.a. I have seen this trouble before > in > http://buildd.debian.org

Re: kde4 on debian arm && armel

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:21:20PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2007-12-19, Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/12/19, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> kde4 release candidates are in experimental. The experimental arm buildd > >> seems to fail to build with some weild errors fro

Re: ImageMagick / convert

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 04:23:34PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 03:17:05PM +0100, Michael Lantzen wrote: > > convert from the ImageMagick package is awfully slow on my N2100, it > > takes about 5 minutes to convert a 8mpixel jpg from the cam to a > > 640x480. When i loo at

Re: Debian on Thecus N2100

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:42:43AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm about to order a re-badged N2100 for use as a home NAS, and have a > few questions about getting Debian onto it. > > I see that 4.0r1 is broken, is it best to install r0 or are there > installer images with the fixed k

Re: firefox on armel

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:25:05PM +0400, Sergey Smirnov wrote: > Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:30:33PM +0400, Sergey Smirnov wrote: > >> Do anybody have firefox/iceweasel for armel? > >> firefox from Debian repository crash on my Zaurus with Debian armel. > >> http://www.gtlib.

Re: ARM installer images for etch (4.0) currently broken

On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:56:21AM +0200, Rainer Hlawaty wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I want to let you know that in my opinion it is still possible to > install Debian 4.0 on NSLU2 using the "normal" installation method. > I used the "unofficial image" (with the driver for the internal network > inter

Re: Thecus n100, software RAID and LVM

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Michele Bini wrote: > Hello everybody, > > first, let me beg your pardon in advance if this is not the proper place to > ask, It is. > but I'm afraid that debian-users is not either. I wouldn't know why not, actually, though I'll agree that more people

Re: Debian on Thecus N2100

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:00:09PM +0100, Steve Gane wrote: > On the N2100, does it behave the same so that one can simply "cat" > to the mtdblock partitions? Martin's page seems to suggest that, yeah: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/iop/n2100/deinstall.html As that page shows, you don't even actual

Re: What demotivates debian-arm? [Was: Re: Bug#425011: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on m68k and arm, multiple definitions of ffi_prep_closure]

On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:12:31PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:08:02PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > > Can you define the characteristics of an architecture that isn't > > in "good shape"? > > How about this one: > > "An architecture is said to be 'not in goo

Re: Palm as terminal for slug - no luck with ncurses application.

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:26:42AM -0700, Bernard Dudley wrote: > I want to use my Palm PDA as a terminal for my slug, and it works well, > except that ncurses apps don't work properly. I started a thread at the > debian forums - http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=14617 - but no > response

Re: Can someone still help with install

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:04:45AM -0600, Gordon Farquharson wrote: > Hi John and Markus > > On 4/18/07, John Fieldsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Could not connect to ftp.uk.debian.org:80 (1.0.0.0), connection timed out > > Ok, so now we need to figure out what is causing the following mes

Re: Continued existance of armeb?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:32:59PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > Wookey wrote: > > It is not clear to me how much demand there is for such a > > distro as few machines actually _need_ to run BE, so most will be > > using armel. > > I seem to remember someone saying that armeb may have network perf

Continued existance of armeb?

Hi, I've been off and on maintaining two buildd hosts over the past year for an armeb architecture, running on two NSLU2's in big endian mode. Andreas Barth (Cc'ed) has been maintaining the ftp-master and wanna-build side of things for that. Since about a month or two, IIRC, ftp-master.debonaras.

Re: Softfloat on ARM?

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:07:39PM +0100, David Fokkema wrote: > simple. Maybe I can write a new pnmscale or modify it in some way. Like "pnmscalefixed"? ;-) -- Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: restricted sourceless ARM uploads

On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:27:03PM +, Martin Guy wrote: > 2006/12/20, Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >We ought to discuss if there > >is any significant reason not to use qemu 'machines' instead of actual > >hardware for slower arches. > > As Wookey knows, I have been building Debian packages t

Re: restricted sourceless ARM uploads

On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote: > > > For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking > > that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the > > binaries will run properly. > >

Re: ARM EABI port: minimum CPU choice

On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 05:01:39PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 12:23:13PM +0200, Martin Guy wrote: > > What is lost is the ability to compile a program in Thumb mode and > > link it against the standard Debian libraries. I would think that > > people who need space optimisat

Re: Need build for xulrunner

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 11:20:20AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:56:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > * Debian build-dependencies do not distinguish between stuff that's > > needed because you need to run it, and stuff that's needed because

Re: Need build for xulrunner

On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:07:02PM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * To be able to cross-build packages, a cross-toolchain has to be > > installed. There are no prebuilt packag

Re: Need build for xulrunner

On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 11:04:57AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:51:34AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote: > > > for cross compiling. However, for c

Re: Need build for xulrunner

On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 08:51:34AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian does not do crosscompiling for packages. > > Really. Perhaps you ought to try a more helpful rep

Re: Need build for xulrunner

On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 06:40:59AM -0700, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > xulrunner 1.8.0.4-1 is in need for a build on arm. The buildd failed it > > because it took too much time, and elmo seems to be a

Re: xorg requiring porting for armeb

On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:41:26PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:08:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Could anyone please have a look at fixing xorg for armeb? There used to > > be a patch for xorg-x11, but it needs to be revisited for

xorg requiring porting for armeb

Hi, Could anyone please have a look at fixing xorg for armeb? There used to be a patch for xorg-x11, but it needs to be revisited for xorg. A whole bunch of things are waiting on this (gtk and everything that depends on it -- which includes gcj, therefore db4.4, and therefore perl), so it'd be ni

Bob down

Hi, Could anyone please kick bob? It isn't listening for SMTP or SSH anymore, although it does still reply to pings. Thanks, -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

issues with gcc(?) on armeb

Hi, I'm starting to see issues on armeb/unstable when configure is running, trying to detect the C compiler; it sometimes errors out with "error: C compiler cannot create executables". Looking through config.log, I see the following: gcc -Wall -ggdb -O2 -z defs conftest.c gcc: defs: No such file

Re: Building gecode fails on arm due to timeout$

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 10:18:24AM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote: > >From gecode's arm build log: > arm-linux-gnu-g++ -I. -I. -DNDEBUG -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing > -finline-limit=3000 -ffast-math -DGECODE_BUILD_SET \ > -c -o set/rel-op-const.o set/rel-op-const.cc > make[1]: **

Re: installing debian-armeb on a new device / where to get the base filesystem?

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:08:33PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-23 12:43]: > > It runs some sort of Linux (big-endian), but I thought it would be a > > better idea to try to run Debian-armeb on this device. > > > > To do this, I would need some

Re: debian arm on nslu2

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 07:38:50AM -0300, Christoph Simon wrote: > Hi, > > I've just installed debian in a NSLU2. Now, I would like to get > bluetooth to work. I've done this already on a common desktop box, but > here, I'm unable to find the modules. I've installed and re-installed > linux-image-

Re: Debian EABI arm port name: armel

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:01:01PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:45:37AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:57:05AM +0200, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote: > > > Why are hyphens bad? We already have hurd-i386... > > > > Which is os-arch. Not quite the

Re: Debian EABI arm port name: armel

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Bill Gatliff wrote: > >David: > > > >David Weinehall wrote: > > > >>Changing the name for the existing ARM arch in Debian is *NOT* an > >>option. It's been stated several times already. > >> > >> > > > >I'm not suggesting that we cha

Re: Deciding new arm EABI port name

On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Martin Guy wrote: > Rather than choose a soapbox to stand on, I'll suggest a few criteria > for it to fit in with the schemes for existing Debian architecture > variants (there is a list at popcorn.debian.org) and to future-proof

localedef hang

Hi guys, It'd been a while since I'd seen a build log from either bob or wendy (armeb buildd hosts), so I went and checked them out. Looks like they both had localedef, as user 'buildd', in an infinite loop. I don't know whether this is an armeb specific thing and/or whether it's been fixed in th

Re: nwutil status

Op ma, 21-11-2005 te 14:46 +, schreef Wookey: > > It's still pretty active, a lot of us use it and contribute bug reports, > > fixes, etc. The big endian contributions have been the most visible > > form of this recently. > > Indeed. It looks like armeb is already more active than arm. Fortu

Re: europa && elara - up and healthy

On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:41:16AM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote: > To everybody else: > Would anybody on the list know if James is still on Planet Earth??? > Still in Debian Universe??? And if so - how to reach him??? Last I heard, James was busy in Ubuntu Below Zero. Not sure how long that's goin

Re: ARM build of scalapack

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:46:04AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > You can browse the build logs on buildd.debian.org. > > I did. It says mpich was build (probably succesful) 2 months ago. It > does not tell me why it still hasn

Re: Re: Announcing an intention to produce an armeb port of Debian

Op do, 13-10-2005 te 19:39 +0300, schreef Velin Pavlov: > Hi, > > I was reading the debian-weekly-news when I came across your > email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about a > request for one (or a few) > machines to be setup as buildd for armeb. > > I have one slug, with 5

Re: requalification of arm as etch release architecture

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:56:26PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:45:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > This is also a useful overview: > > http://spohr.debian.org/~ajt/etch_arch_qualify.html, showing that arm is > > problimatic in the areas of: > > - Not currently having a

Re: freesci build rescedule

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:52:16PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi guys! > > Could you please reschedule freesci in the autobuilder for m68k and > arm?? The builds was failing because of dependency problems of SDL, > but those have been fixed a while back already. Actually, the build on m68k fa

Re: status of cernlib on arm and m68k?

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:06:51PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Could someone please check into the status? I remember there have been > some problems in the past with the log files being too big for automatic > handling, so this may be the case again. Yes, that's what happened indeed. I've j

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bits from the SRM]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:20:02PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 07:58:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > According to buildd.debian.org, logtool_1.0.6-7.woody.1 has been built > > on August 12, at 18:22 on europa, but it hasn't been

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bits from the SRM]

Hi guys. Don't know whether you've seen this, but here's a message from joey that arrived in my mailbox lately. Containing something I'd like to ask you guys about: - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Developmen