octave FTBFS on armhf buildd, but succeeds on porterbox

Hi, octave segfaults on the buildd (hoibi) https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=octave in its testsuite, but builds fine on a porterbox (harris). Any idea what could be the issue and (more important) how to debug it? Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ..

octave3.0 crashes on startup

Hi, we need some help. octave3.0 crashes on startup on ARM (#458852). I attach a backtrace, provided by Soeren Sonnenburg (it's also in the BTS). = OK, I've recompiled octave w/ -O2 -g and it dies on loading dispatch.oct. This c

octave3.0 with ICE on elara

Hi, ../liboctave/Array.h:204: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Can someone please have a look? 2.9.19-2 compiled fine on grieg and there weren't that many changes to Octave's source. Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: octave2.9 ftbfs during linking stage

Am Mittwoch, den 18.07.2007, 02:47 +0100 schrieb Wookey: > OK. It completed fine, suggesting that a requeue on a machine with > enough memory is in order. We could arrange a binNMU of the packages I built > here, although I didn't use pbuilder or check the chroot was uptodate. > (in fact it isn't q

Re: octave2.9 ftbfs during linking stage

Hi, Am Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007 04:15:59 schrieb Wookey: > On 2007-07-16 15:44 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > OK. I started a build to check it does really work. Thanks. > I'll tell you how it went tomorrow as it's bedtime here now. I didn't know that .de and .uk dif

Re: octave2.9 ftbfs during linking stage

Hi, Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 14:45:04 schrieb Thomas Weber: > Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 14:29:30 schrieb Wookey: > > As I say I should be able to do this very soon, but not right now as > > my good machines are in bits. > > No problem; I'm still waiting for

Re: Octaviz ftbfs

Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 18:19:44 schrieb Riku Voipio: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:48:03PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > the build of Octaviz seems to fail for no apparent reason[1]. Can anyone > > please have look? > > > > [1] > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch

Octaviz ftbfs

Hi, the build of Octaviz seems to fail for no apparent reason[1]. Can anyone please have look? [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=octaviz;ver=0.4.5-5;arch=arm;stamp=1183467012 Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: octave2.9 ftbfs during linking stage

Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 14:29:30 schrieb Wookey: > On 2007-06-28 11:16 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 10:55:07 schrieb Wookey: > > > On 2007-06-26 17:54 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > > > > > There have been issues with the gc

Re: octave2.9 ftbfs during linking stage

Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2007 10:55:07 schrieb Wookey: > On 2007-06-26 17:54 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > There have been issues with the gcc4.2 toolchain not building, which I > understand are now fixed, but octave seems to be using gcc3.4 and I'm > not aware of any recent linki

octave2.9 ftbfs during linking stage

Hi, g++/ld segfaults during linking[1]. Is this a known problem? [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=octave2.9&ver=1%3A2.9.12-2&arch=arm&stamp=1182810910&file=log "collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]" Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Build of octave2.9 dies

Hi, the latest build of octave2.9 (2.9.9-8etch1) dies on elara. Can anyone have a look if that's a buildd-specific problem? Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Requeue of Octaviz

Hi, Octaviz fails on europa with an ICE. Can someone please requeue it (the last build on netwinder succeeded)? Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Someone with access to buildd_arm-tofee?

Hi, [please CC me on replies] is there anybody here with access to buildd tofee? Octaviz FTBFS due to a corrupted chroot. For details, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg01566.html A short version can be found in the build log: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=octaviz%26