Le 10 mai 10 à 14:48, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Contrary to my guess, the SIGILL is not triggered by
feenableexcept() but by setjmp().
The bug is [1]known and is fixed in libc6 2.11 currently in
experimental.
[1] http://old.nabble.com/ARM-EABI-setjmp-longjmp-fixes-
td26015953.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
retitle 580529 "setjmp/longjmp broken on ARM w/ FPU"
reassign 580529 libc6 2.10.2
fixed 580529 2.11
thanks
Le 9 mai 10 à 15:37, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
* Thibaut Paumard [2010-05-09 15:19]:
I attach a short test-case which I have us
Hi,
Le 9 mai 10 à 15:42, Martin Guy a écrit :
A quick grep in the source turns up
play/unix/fpuset.c:332
#elif defined(FPU_GCC_ARM)
void
u_fpu_setup(int when)
{
if (when <= 0) {
unsigned int fpucw = 0x70200;
__asm__ ("wfs %0" : : "r" (fpucw));
/* includes bit to trap on signalling
Le 9 mai 10 à 14:03, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
* Luca Niccoli [2010-05-07 11:21]:
This is the info I got from Stephen Gran on d-admin:
Processor : Feroceon rev 0 (v5l)
Hardware: Marvell DB-78x00-BP Development Board
Processor : Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (v5l)
Hardware
Hi,
Le 17 févr. 10 à 13:03, Martin Guy a écrit :
[yorick fails only on ancina]
Before I go off into integer alignment issues, can someone say what
CPU ancina has, please?
This is the info I got from Stephen Gran on d-admin:
Processor : Feroceon rev 0 (v5l)
BogoMIPS: 1199.30
Fea
Le 17 févr. 10 à 13:03, Martin Guy a écrit :
Therefore, I don't know what happened on ancina, nor how to fix it.
The sigill happens when running the newly-created "yorick" binary for
the first time:
[...]
Before I go off into integer alignment issues, can someone say what
CPU ancina has, pl
Hi,
Have you been able to investigate?
I have another related build failure:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=yorick-yeti&arch=armel&ver=6.2.5-2&stamp=1270903998&file=log&as=raw
Here, Yorick is used as a build-dependency and crashes (again on
ancina).
Regards, Thibaut.
Le 17 févr. 1
Hi,
Le 17 févr. 10 à 13:03, Martin Guy a écrit :
I notice that the package has been building successfully sometimes
on armel:
* 2.1.05+dfsg-4 (latest build at Mar 24 07:05: maybe-successful)
* 2.1.05+dfsg-5 (latest build at May 23 22:55: maybe-successful)
* 2.1.05+dfsg-6 (latest build
Le 14 févr. 10 à 10:42, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Hi,
Can someone provide me with access on a porter box?
Regards, Thibaut.
Le 10 févr. 10 à 13:28, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Hi,
One of my packages (yorick) has failed building 3 times with an
"Illegal instruction" signal.
The s
Hi,
Can someone provide me with access on a porter box?
Regards, Thibaut.
Le 10 févr. 10 à 13:28, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Hi,
One of my packages (yorick) has failed building 3 times with an
"Illegal instruction" signal.
The same package has built correctly for years. Do yo
Hi,
One of my packages (yorick) has failed building 3 times with an
"Illegal instruction" signal.
The same package has built correctly for years. Do you have any idea
what is going on?
Début du message réexpédié :
[...]
=== yorick:
= Missing build(s) on armel
This might need manual act
11 matches
Mail list logo