Re: Machine similar to ancina anyone? (was: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel))

2010-05-11 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 10 mai 10 à 14:48, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : Contrary to my guess, the SIGILL is not triggered by feenableexcept() but by setjmp(). The bug is [1]known and is fixed in libc6 2.11 currently in experimental. [1] http://old.nabble.com/ARM-EABI-setjmp-longjmp-fixes- td26015953.html

Re: Machine similar to ancina anyone? (was: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel))

2010-05-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 580529 "setjmp/longjmp broken on ARM w/ FPU" reassign 580529 libc6 2.10.2 fixed 580529 2.11 thanks Le 9 mai 10 à 15:37, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : * Thibaut Paumard [2010-05-09 15:19]: I attach a short test-case which I have us

Re: Machine similar to ancina anyone? (was: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel))

2010-05-09 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Le 9 mai 10 à 15:42, Martin Guy a écrit : A quick grep in the source turns up play/unix/fpuset.c:332 #elif defined(FPU_GCC_ARM) void u_fpu_setup(int when) { if (when <= 0) { unsigned int fpucw = 0x70200; __asm__ ("wfs %0" : : "r" (fpucw)); /* includes bit to trap on signalling

Re: Machine similar to ancina anyone? (was: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel))

2010-05-09 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 9 mai 10 à 14:03, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : * Luca Niccoli [2010-05-07 11:21]: This is the info I got from Stephen Gran on d-admin: Processor : Feroceon rev 0 (v5l) Hardware: Marvell DB-78x00-BP Development Board Processor : Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (v5l) Hardware

Machine similar to ancina anyone? (was: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel))

2010-05-07 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Le 17 févr. 10 à 13:03, Martin Guy a écrit : [yorick fails only on ancina] Before I go off into integer alignment issues, can someone say what CPU ancina has, please? This is the info I got from Stephen Gran on d-admin: Processor : Feroceon rev 0 (v5l) BogoMIPS: 1199.30 Fea

Re: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel)

2010-04-29 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 17 févr. 10 à 13:03, Martin Guy a écrit : Therefore, I don't know what happened on ancina, nor how to fix it. The sigill happens when running the newly-created "yorick" binary for the first time: [...] Before I go off into integer alignment issues, can someone say what CPU ancina has, pl

Re: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel)

2010-04-19 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Have you been able to investigate? I have another related build failure: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=yorick-yeti&arch=armel&ver=6.2.5-2&stamp=1270903998&file=log&as=raw Here, Yorick is used as a build-dependency and crashes (again on ancina). Regards, Thibaut. Le 17 févr. 1

Re: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel)

2010-02-24 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Le 17 févr. 10 à 13:03, Martin Guy a écrit : I notice that the package has been building successfully sometimes on armel: * 2.1.05+dfsg-4 (latest build at Mar 24 07:05: maybe-successful) * 2.1.05+dfsg-5 (latest build at May 23 22:55: maybe-successful) * 2.1.05+dfsg-6 (latest build

Re: DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel)

2010-02-16 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 14 févr. 10 à 10:42, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : Hi, Can someone provide me with access on a porter box? Regards, Thibaut. Le 10 févr. 10 à 13:28, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : Hi, One of my packages (yorick) has failed building 3 times with an "Illegal instruction" signal. The s

DM needs helps with build failure (yorick on armel)

2010-02-14 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Can someone provide me with access on a porter box? Regards, Thibaut. Le 10 févr. 10 à 13:28, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : Hi, One of my packages (yorick) has failed building 3 times with an "Illegal instruction" signal. The same package has built correctly for years. Do yo

Fwd: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-02-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, One of my packages (yorick) has failed building 3 times with an "Illegal instruction" signal. The same package has built correctly for years. Do you have any idea what is going on? Début du message réexpédié : [...] === yorick: = Missing build(s) on armel This might need manual act