Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)

2013-10-06 Thread Sven Luther
Friendly, Sven Luther On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > The final results are in: > > Summary table: > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > ---++-++-++---++-- > armel || 3 |

Re: iMX6 EOMA-68 CPU Card

2013-02-27 Thread Sven Luther
e which has the majority of what most > electrical engineers with 20 years experience [*1] know encoded > instead into automated software. > > so yes, it *can* be done... but not by numptys like me :) Alternatively, you can use a cpu module of some kind, and just do the easy things :) Fri

Re: iMX6 EOMA-68 CPU Card

2013-02-27 Thread Sven Luther
#x27;t up to scratch: there > aren't any with an auto-router function and i'm not knowledgeable > enough to be able to do without applying strict > software-engineering-style rules. I am no electric engineer, but i had a collegue who designed three arm based boards with gEDA,

Re: [D-I] mass kernel udeb update and preparations for RC1

2006-09-19 Thread Sven Luther
week to confirm this. I don't particularly feel like backporting those fixes to 2.6.17, especially as the etch kernel target is 2.6.18, but others may volunteer to do it, or i may do it if i find some time. Friendlly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: D-I Etch Beta2 - Status update (4)

2006-03-07 Thread Sven Luther
produce the compressed vmlinuz-* kernel, and dding it to a prep partition). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Status of d-i kernel transition for 2.6.14

2005-12-08 Thread Sven Luther
til january. There are no 2.4.27 generic powerpc kernels in etch/sid anymore, or there should not be. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Could a rebuild of the cameleon package be retriggered ?

2003-03-28 Thread Sven Luther
enter testing, and this is one of the reasons they do not. Friendly, Sven Luther

Question about the arm autobuilder.

2003-03-12 Thread Sven Luther
ge we are waiting one include the latest tk8.3 (which failed because it depends on tcl8.3 which was uploaded the exact same days as tk8.3, and thus not available), tetex-bin and imagemagick. Friendly, Sven Luther

problem auto-building ocaml related libraries ...

2003-01-01 Thread Sven Luther
autobuilder. I guess installing the newer version of ocaml would be enough to solve this problem. Sorry for having messed up as i did. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: g77 issues

2001-04-19 Thread Sven LUTHER
I bet it isn't really 1 (actually > 1.000111022302 ;-) Maybe there's no bug: it's just truncation > error? Maybe the maths unit on the alpha is better than the one on the ia32 > on > this test (no suprise there!) Also, note that alpha is a 64bit plateform, and that as thus it could be that it handles some things better than ia32 or ppc. Not sure if this influences floating point values, i guess not. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: labltk native code build problem on arm. (PR#327)

2001-04-06 Thread Sven LUTHER
Caml package. Many thanks to Philip > Blundell for providing me with an account to test the fix. Thanks, will apply the patch, build the package on arm (possibly on monday) and upload the package to debian. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: labltk native code build problem on arm. (PR#327)

2001-03-30 Thread Sven LUTHER
medusa.armlinux.org, but maybe, if it would be ok for you, i could see if the arm porter guys could provide you a login there, don't know if they would but i can ask. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
ve installed the 8.3 packages on medusa now. Try it again at your leisure. Ok, but it changes nothing, ... Jacques is looking into it, i sent him the (huge) camlasm0.s file. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
ve installed the 8.3 packages on medusa now. Try it again at your leisure. Ok, i will, ... but i think it is not that, at least that is what i understood from Jacques Garrigue's mail about labltk. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: labltk native code build problem on arm. (PR#327)

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
in size, I can mail it to you, or put it in my anonymous ftp server at : ftp://lambda.u-strasbg.fr/camlasm0.s Hope this helps, it may be truncated though. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: labltk native code build problem on arm. (PR#327)

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
Just cross posting to the debian arm list and Philip Blundell. On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:26:25PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > > Hello, ... > > > > While packaging ocaml 3.01 for debian, i received the following bug report > > from the arm porters. > > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luthe

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
le /tmp/camlasm2.s > make[3]: *** [tk.cmx] Error 2 I get the same still, (sorry for multiple messages here). I just forwarded the bug report upstream, since i cannot fix this myself. Would you like to get in contact with them directly ? if yes, i will forward any further correpondance with them to you also. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
are installed (that would be tcl/tk 8.3-dev, and not the currently installed tcl/tk 8.0 -dev. Does this cause problem ? if yes, i can move the build depends to use 8.0 on arm, and 8.3 elsewhere. Don't worry about the emacs dependency though, as i will remove it in a future ocaml 3.01-5 package. Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
in file /tmp/camlasm2.s > make[3]: *** [tk.cmx] Error 2 Well, i should rebuilt the package on medusa, it bombed at the end, because of the missing emacsen dependency, but the rest of the built went ok. Now, that was with armv3l, not with arm4vl. Could someone please build the package on an armv4l box so that i may close the bug ? Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
be a problem introduced by the passage from whatever binutil version was used in potato and the one in unstable right now. Also, notice, i have seen similar message when building kernels, that where gone when i again upgraded, maybe this is similar ? Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:43:26AM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > >we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these > >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i > >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i k

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-24 Thread Sven LUTHER
e /tmp/camlasm2.s > make[3]: *** [tk.cmx] Error 2 Don't know about it, will forward this to upstream, to see what they think about it. Friendly, Sven, Luther

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-23 Thread Sven LUTHER
ur package on > it later today. Thanks, if it builds correctly, then i will close the bug on monday, and forward the patch upstream. Friendly, Sven Luther

difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-23 Thread Sven LUTHER
bably be detected during this phase. 4) is there something i can put in the package description to say that only the armv4l and sa110 subarch are supported ? Will a package compiled on a armv4l (for example) also work on another flavor of the arm arch ? Friendly, Sven Luther

Re: call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

2001-01-16 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled > > against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x > You mean we have to