Le 21/06/2024 à 15:33, Emanuele Rocca a écrit :
Index: ocaml-5.2.0/otherlibs/runtime_events/runtime_events_consumer.c
Please ignore the diff, this was sent out by mistake as I was testing my
suggestions. I haven't checked any other area in the code, so I'm not
sure what a proper patch should lo
Hi all,
While investigating OCaml 5.2.0 build failure on armel, I realized that
atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel results in a segfault.
See:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/13234#issuecomment-2176079951
for a minimal example.
Is this behaviour known? Is there a will
Dear ARM porters,
These days, eliom FTBFS on armhf buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=eliom
I've given it back several times; the failure is consistent.
However, I cannot reproduce it locally nor on a porterbox (abel).
Looking at the log, a command-line flag is missing
Hi Steve,
Le 13/01/2020 à 18:48, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>> janest-base FTBFS on arm64 (and only on this architecture) (buildd
>> arm-arm-04) with a SIGILL. However, I cannot reproduce on arm64
>> porterbox (amdahl). I've given it back, and it still fails (on arm-ubc-02).
>>
>> Does somebody have
Dear ARM experts,
janest-base FTBFS on arm64 (and only on this architecture) (buildd
arm-arm-04) with a SIGILL. However, I cannot reproduce on arm64
porterbox (amdahl). I've given it back, and it still fails (on arm-ubc-02).
Does somebody have an idea on what's going on?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
The test suite of ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1 fails on armel because the
following program:
#include
int main() {
void *buffer[100];
return backtrace(buffer, 100);
}
returns 0. It returns with a non-zero status (3 everywhere I've
6 matches
Mail list logo
