ld be good if a Hurd porter could perhaps
see why--I can't see anything obviously wrong..
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.n
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:04:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 16.11.2010 10:42, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:
linker. See the already filed bug reports.
This change is one I can agree with on technical grounds, though it
will cause a great deal of pain in the short term. Have we got any
estimates on exactly how much breakage will result before the change
gets made?
Regards,
Roger
--
.'&#
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:02:57PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 16:06, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>>> While I understand the rationale for --no-copy-dt-needed-entries for
>>>> preventing encapsulation violations via indirect linking, I don't agree
>>
library changes how it works but
without changing its public interface, I could be screwed again in six
months time. This is partly the fault of Boost for exposing its
internals in its headers, but disallowing indirect linking make it
worse.
Overall, it could be for the best, but it will be painf
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
&
*should not be
second-guessing the user*. This can break perfectly legitimate code
making use of ELF constructors and other features which won't be
picked out just by looking at symbol usage.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://p
tags 580136 + fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:57:25PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> tags 580136 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> > Roger Leigh writes:
> >
> > > Could the Debian ARM l
tags fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:57:25PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I've attached a patch for schroot which removes the need for
> getting the personality from the kernel. We cache the set
> personality and return that instead. Not as nice as I woul
tags 580136 + patch
thanks
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Roger Leigh writes:
>
> > Could the Debian ARM list/porters possibly comment upon this
> > bug? Please could you keep buildd-tools-devel and the bug
> > in the CC on any reply.
art
of the interface.
Many thanks,
Roger
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:20:02PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 21:01, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> Package: schroot
>> Severity: serious
>> Version: 1.4.2-1
>>
>> schroot FTBFS's on armel due to:
>&
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I rebuilt yesterday and uploaded last night, it's in incoming.
Thanks!
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
The dependencies should have been available a few days later, but it's
not been retried in three weeks. Would it be possible to requeue it
for a build, since it's part of the libtiff transition?
Many thanks,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?
13 matches
Mail list logo
