On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:04:06AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/12/20 1:01 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On 5/11/20 11:56 PM, Xavier wrote:
> >> Could someone help us here ? I forwarded this bug to upstream ([1]) but
> >> didn't receive any response for now.
> >>
> >> (
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:12:27AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/23/18 10:03 AM, wf...@niif.hu wrote:
> > Thanks to everybody for their spot-on comments, and especially to Steve
> > for his detailed analysis in the bug report. Meanwhile I reproduced the
> > error on the sparc64 p
[I've trimmed the CCes a bit.]
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:52:12PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Hello Adrian!
> >
> > Thanks for raising awareness about this issue. If there's anything
> > I can do to help please tell m
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 01:32:16AM +, peter green wrote:
> On 27/02/15 00:44, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
> >>Storage interfaces can also be an issue. USB is ubiquitous on arm boards
> >>but the implementations can be shaky and this has made me wary
> >
> >Do you need a lot of on-device storage a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> the problematic line is:
>
> ...
> g++ -O3 -DHAVE_BZLIB -Icityhash -Wall -Wsign-compare -g -c -o align.o
> align.cc
> In file included from align.cc:22:0:
> vsearch.h:30:23: fatal error: x86intrin.h: No such file or directory
> #i
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:26:43PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> >This should give the rest of GNOME a chance to build now...
> Unfortunately we aren't there yet.
>
> Currently installability of gnome-core is blocked by the chain
> (note: this is probablly not the only bl
FWIW, I am a porter of the Alpha architecture in the following ways:
- run a buildd
- kernel support
- work with upstreams for toolchain support
- general porting work including filing bugs and patches
I doubt if I will continue that for the life cycle of Jessie given that
many of the former
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:22:10PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Michael Cree wrote:
> >I would presume though that to be hosted at debian-ports a new
> >architecture tag would be needed to avoid confusion with armhf.
> As I have said before i'm strongly against
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:10:16AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> One possibility if there is someone sufficiently interested* in unstable
> for the Pi would be to use ports.debian.net for that and keep
> raspbian.org for testing and stable (for various reasons having a
> derivative of unstable and a
9 matches
Mail list logo
