Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?

2023-12-03 Thread Mate Kukri
, and some segmentation faults in gsasl outside any debugging tools (although I did not investigate these in much detail). There are also claims from upstream about the implementation on 32-bit arm being questionable, and no other distros s Mate Kukri FTR there is no issue in Debian with any of

Re: debugging gsasl autopkg test error on armhf

2023-12-03 Thread Mate Kukri
Hello, That is the same issue we had in Ubuntu, and is caused by the recent addition of the -fstack-clash-protection compiler flag. There is an earlier thread discussing exactly this on debian-arm. Mate Kukri On 12/3/23 17:20, Andreas Metzler wrote: Hello, gnutls28 is currently blocked

Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?

2023-12-03 Thread Mate Kukri
being questionable, and no other distros seem to ship it. I believe enabling this before more upstream work to fix these issues would be unwise. Breaking valgrind and gdb is already problematic enough by itself, let alone any previously unknown issues discovered entering uncharted waters. Mate