Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > - tofee: up, building packages, sometimes stable-security.
> >
> > I think it is time to changes things. Our faster build daemons have a
> > 233MHz CPU with 256MB of RAM, while there are way faster ARM CPU today.
>
> How much faster is the fast
I'm experiencing a strange connection hangup, maybe somebody could
explain what's happening - or develop a fix?
This is on leisner.debian.org in the sid chroot while configuring
locales:
Setting up locales (2.3.6-3) ...
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/share/perl
Joey Hess wrote:
> Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > I'm trying to debug a build failure of graphicsmagick on arm[0]. Alas,
> > leisner seems to suffer from unstable NFS, and agnesi lacks
> > build-essential, so I'm asking for help here.
>
> Have you tried contacting debian-admin? Here, I'll CC them.
Bui
Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:35:32AM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> > Any idea who nowadays is in charge of ARM builds / machines / accounts?
> > Are these machines still needed then?
Still the same person as far as I know.
> Most urgently,arm port is missing a develop
Dear developers,
there will be another Linux developers meeting taking place in
Oldenburg at the last weekend in September this year. Like last year,
we will be able to start on Wednesday and work until Sunday. So
diligent people can work up to four days in Oldenburg.
Executive summary:
URL:
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Moin!
>
>Invitation to the Oldenburg Linux Developers Meeting #9
>---
>
> Executive summary:
>
> URL: http://oldenburger.linuxtage.de/Oldenburg2004/
Correct URL is
Moin!
Invitation to the Oldenburg Linux Developers Meeting #9
---
Executive summary:
URL: http://oldenburger.linuxtage.de/Oldenburg2004/
What: Oldenburg Linux Developers Meeting #9
Who: Every developer interested in Linux on
[Resent as single mail since the Debian spamfilter prevented its
distribution due to a crosspost on five lists. --Joey]
Hello everybody,
as always, it has taken quite some time to get the required
confirmation from our University that we can hold the Oldenburg Linux
Developers Meeting again.
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 3.0r1.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 3.0r1.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
Can somebody supply some? debussy has an empty potato chroot,
rameau doesn't have one but seems to run a mixture of woody and
potato with no potato chroot, europa runs unstable, I'm runnning
out of machines...
A chroot would be sufficient. (No, I don't want to build one
on my own, I'm also runn
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r7.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r6.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r6.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r6.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r6.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
Hi,
I tried to recompile the stable version of at (3.1.8-10) on a stable
arm machine (rameau) but wasn't quite successful:
gcc -c -O -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DVERSION=\"3.1.8\" -DETCDIR=\"/etc\"
-DLOADAVG_MX=1.5 -DDAEMON_USERNAME=\"daemon\" -DDAEMON_GROUPNAME=\"daemon\"
-DLFILE=\"/var/spool/cron/atjobs
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r5.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r5.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on arm in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r5.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation please
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 12:37:25PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/contrib/source/misc/webrt_1.0.1-4.dsc
> > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/contrib/source/misc/webrt_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
>
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/y/yabasic/yabasic_2.53.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/y/yabasic/yabasic_2.53-2.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/y/yabasic/yabasic_2.53-2.diff.gz
This package requires an upload to stable for these architectures:
alpha, arm and i386.
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/contrib/source/misc/webrt_1.0.1-4.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/contrib/source/misc/webrt_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/contrib/source/misc/webrt_1.0.1-4.diff.gz
Please recompile this for potato.
Regards,
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postgresql/postgresql_6.5.3.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postgresql/postgresql_6.5.3-27.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/postgresql/postgresql_6.5.3-27.diff.gz
This package requires a recompilation and upload to stable for t
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xtel/xtel_3.2.1.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xtel/xtel_3.2.1-4.potato.1.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xtel/xtel_3.2.1-4.potato.1.diff.gz
This package requires a recompile and upload to stable for the
following architectur
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/netkit-telnet/netkit-telnet_0.16.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/netkit-telnet/netkit-telnet_0.16-4potato.3.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/netkit-telnet/netkit-telnet_0.16-4potato.3.diff.gz
This package requires an upload to
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/freewnn/freewnn_1.1.0+1.1.1-a016.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/freewnn/freewnn_1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/freewnn/freewnn_1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3.diff.gz
A recompile of this package is re
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bwbasic/bwbasic_2.20pl2.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bwbasic/bwbasic_2.20pl2-3.2.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bwbasic/bwbasic_2.20pl2-3.2.diff.gz
An upload of this version for stable is required for the following
archite
It would be nice if boot-floppies_2.2.26 would be uploaded into stable for
all missing archs, i.e. for alpha, arm, m68k, powerpc, sparc
Especially a powerpc upload would be nice since the only
reason for 2.2.26 to get into stable is to fix powerpc
problems...
Regards,
Joey
--
It's time
ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/w/w3m-ssl/w3m-ssl_0.1.10+0.1.11pre+kokb23.orig.tar.gz
ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/w/w3m-ssl/w3m-ssl_0.1.10+0.1.11pre+kokb23-4.dsc
ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/w/w3m-ssl/w3m-ssl_0.1.10+0.1.11p
FYI - Do something about it. :)
Regards,
Joey
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:50:01AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Is there a problem with arm? I just noticed that quite some packages are not
> > moved to testing because there is no binary on arm including my quota
-
6th Linux Developers Meeting in Oldenburg
Thursday, September 27th to Sunday, 30th
University of Oldenburg, Wechloy
-
This is the publ
Another related question, I've read both Netwinder and NetWinder
on our /ports/arm/ pages. Which one is correct and which one should
be used there?
Regards,
Joey
--
Let's call it an accidental feature. --Larry Wall
Hi,
sorry to disturb you but I've worked on /ports/arm/ recently and
stomped over these three spellings (NetROM, NettROM and NeTTrom).
Which one is correct and which one should be used on the web pages?
Despite that, after the pages have been rebuilt today, take a
look at them and tell me what's
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r4
=
Up-to-date version on http://master.debian.org/~joey/2.2r4/
Recompiles required
---
These packages need further investigation. One reason the package is
listed here could be that I'm not yet convinced th
Philip Blundell wrote:
> >I'm building 2.2.19 kernels for ARM at the moment. This will probably take
> >most of the afternoon, but if all goes well I will do potato boot-floppies
> >next.
>
> The netwinder kernel image didn't build properly, and I wasn't able to fix it
> in time to make the bo
Philip Blundell wrote:
> >I'm building 2.2.19 kernels for ARM at the moment. This will probably take
> >most of the afternoon, but if all goes well I will do potato boot-floppies
> >next.
>
> The netwinder kernel image didn't build properly, and I wasn't able to fix it
> in time to make the bo
So who's working on INN2 2.2.2.2000.01.31-5 for alpha, arm and powerpc
for proposed-updates?
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/i/inn2/inn2_2.2.2.2000.01.31.orig.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/i/inn2/inn2_2.2.2.2000.01.31-5.dsc
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/i/inn2/inn2_2.2
If somebody is compiling boot-floppies 2.2.22 (for stable through
proposed-updates) for any non-i386 arch, please let me know.
At the moment, I know that powerpc does not build due to a
kernel issue. I don't know anything about the other archs.
Arch's in question: alpha, arm, m68k, sparc.
Regar
Hi!
Petr Cech has compiled php4 for **stable** again, since it contained two
bugs that should not make it into stable. He has placed his files on
pandora.d.o/~cech/php4 so any maintainer can grab it.
Petr, please upload it to stable. Somebody has to recompile it for other
five architectures. P
[Not only Overfiend wants to spam, me too Please be careful when
replying to this mail.]
Packages listed below need a recompile for some architectures.
Could these be issued? Since they'll have to go into stable
please ensure that you build them on a stable machine.
Further investigation
---
41 matches
Mail list logo
