On 10/02/2012 08:48 PM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> ancina didn't seem to come back from the reboot after this last point
> release. Can you take a look when you get a moment?
It's running, so I guess something network related broke. ARM guys, do
you have an idea where to look?
Cheers
Luk
On 05/19/2012 05:00 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
>> I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway
Hi
As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway.
Cheers
Luk
On 05/19/2012 10:28 AM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:00:18AM +
Hi
Maybe it's an option to revert using libvorbisidec-dev and use
libvorbis-dev again on armel to fix the FTBFS of mpd?
debian-arm and Joey Cc-ed so they can give input as I'm unsure if
current ARM hardware does have floating point support to make this
reasonable.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Amandeep Bhullar wrote:
Hi Friends,
I am new to this so I might be asking something very simple. But I do
need your help.
I have an ARM based board AT91SAM9263-EK and I want to run Debian on it.
I am running U-Boot 2009.03.
What options do I have for installation. I don't have a CD-ROM interfa
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This also raises the question what to do about arm, i.e. whether we
> can remove support for arm from the kernel, installer and other
> packages. Riku and Aurelien initially agreed to remove it, but then
> Riku pointed out that we may have to keep support around in sid if
Martin Guy wrote:
> On 7/25/08, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * afnix:
>>
>> ../../../cnf/bin/afnix-aexec: line 78: 25032 Segmentation fault
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ld_lib_path DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ld_lib_path $pexe $binopt $1
>
> needs to be com
Hi
The following FTBFS are blocking RC bug fixes to migrate to testing. Can
someone please have a look if some of these could be fixed/worked
around, TIA?
Cheers
Luk
* adonthell:
*** warning: prefs::read_adonthellrc: creating config file failed
Fatal Python error: exceptions bootstrapping erro
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >From a release team point of view, it's quite interesting if armel is
> going to make it into the archive before lenny. It's quality is at least
> matching the current arm port at the moment and after lenny (at the
> latest)
> Now we have several overlapping mechanisms to avoid building packages
> on selected architectures. Worse, we don't have any proper instructions
> explaining which mechaism to use.
>
> 1) Architecture: list in package source
>
> This is what gsynaptics does now. wanna-build will still off
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> I wish things were such simple. Here is the root cause etc.
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Dear porter, please enlighten me.
>>>
>&
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dear porter, please enlighten me.
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:26:20PM +, Martin Guy wrote:
>> Package: gsynaptics
>> Version: 0.9.7-3
>> Severity: wishlist
>> User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: eabi
>>
>> Please add "armel" to the architecture list
Hi
Can you please add yourself to [0] and/or [1] if you are actively
working on respectively arm or armel issues. Feel free to complete the
pages for the other criteria as well...
Cheers
Luk
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/armLennyReleaseRecertification
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/armelLennyRelea
Hi porters
To make sure we deliver quality for all the architectures we support, we
want to start the architecture requalification process from scratch
again. Therefor we invite people to create and fill in the respective wiki
pages. Please only add yourself to the wiki page when you are an active
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Lennert Buytenhek writes:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
package:gcc-4.1
version:4.1.2-7
severity:serious
from the relavent buildd logs:
>>> Note, that the severity is not RC for 68k; I do not intend to fix
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Can anyone enlighten me how I should solve the FTBFS of dmalloc [1], TIA?
Cheers
Luk
[1]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dmalloc&ver=5.4.2-1&arch=arm&stamp=1105181068&file=log&as=raw
extract:
arm-linux-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -DHAVE_STDARG_H=1 -DHA
16 matches
Mail list logo
