Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

is our requirement, effectively. The mild concern has not blocked the port from releasing. That said, the concern should be documented. > If push comes to shove, we could also talk to IBM. Pretty much all POWER > hardware we have was sponsored by IBM; it's not unreasonable to assume they > might be willing to also sponsor s390x time or hardware. -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

both extensive and impressive. I'm seeking greater definition of the role and the language used. [1]: https://www.debian.org/devel/join/ -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

t is still hosted by post-secondary institutions where commercial activity using university resources is frowned upon.) -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian

Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)

nal hardware community is interested in having Debian ported to their architecture, then we should not need to purchase hardware. Nor should we need to accept buggy pre-production hardware. So, our concern remains: buildd and porter boxen for the mips* and arm* need some attention fr

Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

ellent observations, let's not scare away the potential donor quite yet :) [/me waves at David] Luca Debian System Administration Team Debian Hardware Donations Team -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

an. Thanks again, Luca Debian System Administration Team Debian Hardware Donations Team -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian signature.asc Description: Digital signature