On 28/06/04 10:25 +0100, ext Peter Naulls wrote:
> > Do you have a list of the tools that would be needed?
>
> I really meant libraries. They are simply those listed by the
> build-depends in the Debian OO package:
-- snip --
> There are some tools in there of course. And of course, it is possi
Hi,
> Scratchbox isn't really up to the challenege (install all the
> needed tools in SB is hard enough),
Do you have a list of the tools that would be needed?
/lauri
ext Peter Naulls wrote:
You could argue that patching these packages/encouraging
the maintainers to make them cross compile might be rather less effort
(and pay dividends later) than building a system like scratchbox.
Well, this might be true. Or then it might not. I don't know, and based
on the e
ext Peter Naulls wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lauri Leukkunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ext Peter Naulls wrote:
Do they? :-)
All these I have cross compiled without incident (and many more):
XFree86, The GIMP, Dillo, knews, freeciv, and of course all the related
li
ext Peter Naulls wrote:
I'm a bit concerned by the impression given by the whole scratchbox
idea, especially its rationale for existing. I'm not saying it doesn't
have its place, but, as many people will atest to, the majority of
basic unix utilities can and do cross compile, using well defined (i
ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
It only runs configure on a connected ARM machine. Scratchbox includes
cross compilers for arm-linux-gcc 2.95, 3.3, and arm-linux-clibc, so it's a
pretty big download. I've just used the cross compilers so far.
Just to clarify a bit:
The major thing scratchbox does is that
6 matches
Mail list logo
