Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so
that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a
mail to that list asking for help.
Kurt
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success
> > > on architectures not tested by upstream.
> >
> > And have Format->Character in Impress crash w
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote:
>On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3
>>> and
>>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about
>>> how he
>>> regretted the m
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:51:50PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:24 AM peter green wrote:
> >
> > I got a report from a user about "openssl sha1 " not working for
> > large files on raspbian stretch.
> >
> > I investigated the problem and found that when I tried to use
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:53:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> AFAIK there are potentially still similar problems with ARMv5 - lack
> of architcture-defined barrier primitives for C++11 atomics to
> work. (I'd love to be corrected on this if people know better!) This
> is one of the key points h
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0200, ni...@thykier.net wrote:
> * If we were to enable -fPIE/-pie by default in GCC-6, should that change
>also apply to this port? [0]
If -fPIE is the default will -fPIC override it?
It will also default to tell the linker to use -pie, but then
don't do
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable
> > (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We
> > need to run sparc with olds
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> >> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
> >>
> >> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no a
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
>
> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> > the machines we use.
>
>
> afair buildd are:
> marvell DB-78x00 -> should be supported by armel kernel flavour mx78xx0
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I'll make GCC 4.6 the
> > default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at
> > least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc.
>
> If you do the switch
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
> > on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
> > summarized in http:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:49:36AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> After discussion on the debian-arm mailing list. Martin Michlmayr
> offered his help and tried to reproduce the FTBFS on armel, but he
> could not (*)
> So I would like to request a give back on paraview on armel
>
> gb paraview_
12 matches
Mail list logo