ote management.
Troubling local hands to change a disk once in a while is reasonable; being
blocked waiting for a power cycle on a regular basis is not (and I can't
imagine hosting sponsors are wild about their employees' time being used
for that either).
Development boards just don&
ian can't reliably run builders for an
architecture we do not do users a service by pretending to be able to
support it in a formal release. A freeze may be for Christmas, but stable
is for at least five+ years.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@
h a mail.
Thanks.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
On 2016-10-31 13:31, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
The only change from Jessie is the removal of powerpc as a release
architecture.
...and adding of mips64el. Oops.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http
masters, not the release team.
For the release team:
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description
will be a release architecture for Stretch (taking
input from other teams with an interest, such as DSA).
Other participants are welcome, but we ask that you are read-only unless
we need information from you.
(With apologies for the short notice.)
--
Jonathan
6 matches
Mail list logo