On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 04:26:16PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:24 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > > What's wrong with the soc subsystem (drivers/base/soc.c). This
> > > > > > provides a way to export SoC through standardised interfaces.
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:07:40PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 February 2014 01:47:31 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 16:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 20 February 2014 14:21:10 Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > For all I know, the only interesting ixp4xx
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:39:16AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:19 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > What's wrong with the soc subsystem (drivers/base/soc.c). This
> > provides a way to export SoC through standardised interfaces.
>
> It looks like the thing to u
3 matches
Mail list logo