Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

2024-08-25 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:46:35AM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > > I'll note that fakeroot was probably broken on armel, armhf since > > the t64 migration until mid-August. > > Is fakeroot involved in any way? If so, it might make sense to > > discard any results from that period. > Thanks for

Re: Summary of the Arm ports BoF at DC18

2018-10-29 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:01:05PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I now have 3 more basic Synquacer machines in my posession, ready to > order new cases, RAM, etc. (They ship in desktop cases with a single > 1TB hard drive and 4 GiB of RAM.) Again, I'm hoping to pick more up in > the future, but su

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-07 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:18:24PM +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Problem 2: CPU's built-in graphics work badly. > [...] Skylake > graphics probably need some yet unreleased kernel version. Skylake != Skylake I have another Skylake system which works ok with 4.6 kernel and xorg-server-video-intel

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:55:39AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > ACK - I'm not wedded to the name in the slightest. It's more a > proposal of what we're going to do. ok, cool. > >maybe "jessie+bpo-installer" would be a better fit? > Maybe that fits, but it's horrid name. I don't think it's tha

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:43:14PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >I assume "forking" the kernel for jessie+½ as done for etch-and-half is > >the plan already? (forking as in using a new source package…) > God, no - really *not* that way at all. I'm thinking of using the > kernel in backports at th

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > I still wonder if a fork of the last linux:src=4.4, updated to bring > it to linux-4.4.14 would be a lower support burden? I'm still finding > that there are a fair number of issues reported with 4.5.x and 4.6.x > on various mai

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Holger Levsen
thanks to everyone explaining arch:any to me :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > ppc64: > > This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have > over > 11.000 packages installed [...] > sparc64: > We are close to 11.000 installed packages. I'm not sure whether you are tal

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-25 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, just nitpicking about a single detail here… On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:55:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The reason why I did it within Freexian is that it was just the simplest > way to get it started and to prove that given some sane rules it's > possible to not harm the Debian commun

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-23 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:16:19PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce > > soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so > > an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice. > > So, I'm a bit

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64?

2016-03-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, as a general comment to the Debian ARM people: thanks a lot for your insightful comments, even though they smashed the idea of cheap arm64 Debian builders for now! Much appreciated feedback! On Sonntag, 6. März 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > That said, I'm not sure how much CPU/board dive

Re: DebCamp15

2015-04-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Neil, thanks for sharing your interesting plans and sorry for the late reply... On Freitag, 20. Februar 2015, Neil Williams wrote: > > what is this lava stuff? > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/lava-server > Continuous integration system currently in use for kernel and > bootloader testing

Re: DebCamp15

2015-02-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Neil, On Freitag, 20. Februar 2015, Neil Williams wrote: > Is there interest in people gathering for DebCamp15 with an idea of > setting up something like lava.debian.net to cover these areas: > > Ideas and use cases for lava.debian.org (initially lava.debian.net) to > act as a frontend to dev

Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)

2013-10-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013, Stewart Smith wrote: > Jenkins can have slaves on remote hosts, via SSH. It runs a small java > app there, so as long as the arch has a JVM then you're pretty right. that JVM is not even needed, just schedule jobs via ssh and be done. cheers, Holger

Re: Bug#697128: missing ata-modules for d-i on efikamx: no disk found, also with wheezy Beta4

2013-01-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The NOR flash only contains u-boot and its configuration, not any > filesystem. Do those need to be written during installation? I believe so, there is a bootscript which needs to be (re-)written, as it might not exist / exist only in diff

Re: missing ata-modules for d-i on efikamx: no disk found, also with wheezy Beta4

2013-01-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Ben, On Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The i.MX53 has a SATA controller so I think we should put pata_imx in > pata-modules, ahci_platform in sata-modules, and libata in ata-modules. sounds good. > You originally wrote: > > I've tried to use the Wheezy Alpha1 images for arm

missing ata-modules for d-i on efikamx: no disk found, also with wheezy Beta4

2013-01-01 Thread Holger Levsen
clone 675017 -1 reassign -1 src:linux tags -1 + patch retitle -1 missing ata-modules for d-i on efikamx, breaking d-i wheezy Beta4 -1 blocks 675017 thanks Hi, the fix seems to be easy: $ svn info|grep URL URL: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/linux/debian/installer $ echo -e "libata\n

d-i on efikamx: no disk found, also with wheezy Beta4

2013-01-01 Thread Holger Levsen
retitle 675017 installation-reports: wheezy beta4 on efikamx: no disk found thanks Hi, trying again with files downloaded today from http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer- armhf/current/images/mx5/netboot/efikamx/ today, it fails exactly like described in #675017 before.

also on sid (Re: Bug#675017: installation-reports: wheezy alpha 1 on efikamx: no disk found)

2012-05-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I can confirm this bug also with the network-console images from sid, downloaded from http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-armhf/current/images/mx5/network-console/efikamx/ cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Bug#675017: installation-reports: wheezy alpha 1 on efikamx: no disk found

2012-05-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: installation-reports Severity: important Tags: d-i I've tried to use the Wheezy Alpha1 images for armhf on my efikamx, but it would not find any disks, neither the internal flash nor an external usbstick nor the sd-card used to boot. │ No disk drive was detected. If you know the nam

Re: armhf TODO (was Re: Fosdem 2011: Debian on ARM)

2011-02-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, kudos for all your work on armhf! On Montag, 7. Februar 2011, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > * Now that squeeze has been released, I plan to increase the severity of > all armhf-related bug reports to at least "serious". IMO you should discuss this on -devel. Or am I missing something obvi

Re: Porting Debian to the Excito B3

2011-01-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2011, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > 2. How can such a kernel, prepended with some bytes, be > >bootable at all, as this shifts its entry point and all its data? > That's an excellent question. I kinda assumed that the bytes were actually > ARM machine code, but I've ne

Re: ARMv4-support in armel/squeeze?

2010-12-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 20. Dezember 2010, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > a. identify all the circural dependencies in the package tree > (probably something ilke that is already done using some tool) http://debian.semistable.com/debgraph.out.html cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Th

Re: Bug#604013: base: "ls -al" on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes with -1 ENOMEM

2010-11-19 Thread Holger Levsen
reassign 604013 linux-2.6 user debian-arm@lists.debian.org usertag 604013 + eabi thanks On Freitag, 19. November 2010, Robert Heinzmann wrote: > Package: base > Severity: normal > > ** Please type your report below this line *** > > I'm running Debian on Seagate Dockstar (Kirkwood platform). When

Re: Slight hiccup for etch users with the new linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf

2008-09-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi John, thanks for your bugreport. Full quote for the benefit of the etchnhalf mailinglist: On Friday 15 August 2008 16:37, John Winters wrote: > I put the new etch-and-a-half kernel on my N2100 today to cure its > slight NFS problems. All seemed well at first until I realised that it > was no

Re: ARM kernel snapshots - 2.6.26-rc8

2008-07-10 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Martin, On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:16, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I guess there's no harm in turing CONFIG_ATA and the driver the FSG-3 > needs back one. Which one does it need? sata_via. Thank you, Holger pgpLGrs8raP7P.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ARM kernel snapshots - 2.6.26-rc8

2008-07-05 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I'm trying to build a d-i kernel for the FSG-3... On Wednesday 25 June 2008 19:11, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I've built some kernel snapshots for arm and armel based on > 2.6.26-rc8. Please test them on your favourite ARM machine > and report success or failures to this list. Using Rod Whit

Re: ARM kernel snapshots - 2.6.26-rc7

2008-06-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Monday 23 June 2008 06:56, Rod Whitby wrote: > I'd like to start work on a Freecom FSG-3 kernel config in Debian, for > when upstream support finally gets merged in 2.6.27 ... I guess adding those patches to the debian 2.6.26 kernel is no option? regards, Holger pgpjZkV9EmTv2.p

Re: (native) debian(-installer) support for fsg-3

2008-04-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:22, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'll put my notes about redboot and mtd up on > http://layer-acht.org/debian/fsg-3/ tomorrow. done. Feedback very welcome. > regards, > Holger pgpPt7lgnmzlv.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: (native) debian(-installer) support for fsg-3

2008-04-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Wednesday 19 March 2008 02:12, Rod Whitby wrote: > >> Is there anything else we need in userland (or other kernel patches) > >> which isnt in lenny already? > We'll need flash-kernel support and userland led management. Ok, cool, that's not much :-) The flash-kernel package already suppor

Re: (native) debian(-installer) support for fsg-3

2008-04-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 18 March 2008 21:46, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Using RedBoot and not replacing it with any other bootloader is by far > the safest way to flash FSG-3. Yeah, I've learned this by now too :) (As in, the bootloader support seems to be included in the cpu subtype support in the kern