On 2014-02-21 13:07, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 21 February 2014 01:47:31 Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 16:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 February 2014 14:21:10 Ian Campbell wrote:
> For all I know, the only interesting ixp4xx platforms are the consumer
> produ
On 2014-02-16 20:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 20:12 +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
So how does the stock firmware disable the watchdog during the boot?
Via the kernel driver perhaps? Maybe via a custom ioctl. You'll have to
use the (kernel) source I'm afraid.
O
So how does the stock firmware disable the watchdog during the boot?
Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 23:46 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> I'm trying to get qcontrol / ttyS1 to work with the default QNAP kernel
>> and I just cannot seem to get it to do anything.
I was rather hoping for a response more along the lines of "here's a download
link for the specific .deb you need for the TS-421".
Tim Fletcher wrote:
>On 15/02/14 00:01, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> On 02/13/2014 07:26 PM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
>>>> On 13 Feb
On 02/13/2014 07:26 PM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
On 13 Feb 2014, at 10:48, Gordan Bobic wrote:
It looks like there is a bug in kernel 3.2.0-4-kirkwood
WRT how it handles the memory on QNAP TS-421. The stock
kernel shows the full 1GB of RAM, the Debian kernel
shows 880488KB.
Also in dmesg
I'm trying to get qcontrol / ttyS1 to work with the default QNAP kernel
and I just cannot seem to get it to do anything.
# echo -n g > /dev/ttyS1
-bash: echo: write error: Input/output error
# qcontrol --direct watchdog off
Failed to set attributes for /dev/ttyS1: Input/output error
Normally I
On 2014-02-13 11:08, Divya Subramanian wrote:
but ubunu touch has been ported to Nexus device. How was that
possible?
Regards,
Divya Subramanian
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Gordan Bobic
wrote:
Lack of a keyboard and an accurate pointing device for a start.
On 2014-02-13 10:00,
It looks like there is a bug in kernel 3.2.0-4-kirkwood
WRT how it handles the memory on QNAP TS-421. The stock
kernel shows the full 1GB of RAM, the Debian kernel
shows 880488KB.
Also in dmesg:
Truncating RAM at 2000-3fff to -367f (vmalloc region
overlap).
...
Memory: 872MB = 872M
Lack of a keyboard and an accurate pointing device for a start.
On 2014-02-13 10:00, Divya Subramanian wrote:
How is it suboptimal? I could not understand how UI constraints come
into scene .
Regards,
Divya Subramanian
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Gordan Bobic
wrote:
You should be
Ah, param.conf. Can't believe I missed something that obvious. Thanks.
Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 00:36 +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> OK, I have Debian running on my QNAP now. :)
>>
>> I'm having a read through the initramfs but I can't see
You should be able to get this working pretty trivially in a chroot. Google for
running Linux in a chroot on Android. Running it as the primary OS on tablets
tends to be suboptimal due to the UI constraints of tablets.
Divya Subramanian wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to port debian on Samsung gal
OK, I have Debian running on my QNAP now. :)
I'm having a read through the initramfs but I can't seem to figure out
where the rootfs override occurs. I can see all the standard stuff that
is figuring out which FS it is by LABEL= and UUID= specifications on the
kernel command line, but that is
On 02/12/2014 08:22 PM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
On 12/02/14 11:14, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get an alternative distro running on my
QNAP TS-421, and the only Linux distro I can find that
has any support for it is Debian ARM, so here I am.
I have managed to defeat most of the
On 2014-02-12 14:07, Björn Wetterbom wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Gordan Bobic
wrote:
TS-421 doesn't save it's u-boot variables on NAND. As
far as I can tell, they are always saved on a virtual
MTD partition (mtdblock4) in RAM, and overwritten on
every boot with the pr
On 2014-02-12 13:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 12:26 +, Gordan Bobic wrote:
As far as I can tell, the standard Debian install for
the QNAP NAS-es also runs from on-board NAND and thus
runs with the default u-boot parameters.
This is not the case, Debian will be installed
On 2014-02-12 11:57, iacchi wrote:
Gordan Bobic ha scritto:
Is there a better way? Is there an alternative
u-boot available for use on these, one that can
handle persistent variable saving?
Hi,
have you tried to read these pages?
http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/
Yes I did, that is
Hi,
I am trying to get an alternative distro running on my
QNAP TS-421, and the only Linux distro I can find that
has any support for it is Debian ARM, so here I am.
I have managed to defeat most of the problems with it
this far, but u-boot continues to be a problem.
TS-421 doesn't save it's u-
On 11/11/2011 12:09 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 11/11/2011 10:50 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
oh my goodness me. our little factory said
On 11/11/2011 10:50 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
oh my goodness me. our little factory said they couldn't do 32gb NAND
for $100, but would 16gb be ok? hum i've asked them to do a quick
breakdown so we can work out options :)
Is that for the whole board or just for the NAND?
A 32GB
On 09/11/2011 21:32, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
they were planning to make room for up to 4gb NAND flash *but*...
something just occurred to me / my associates: thailand's under water.
the implications of that are that the factories which used to make
low-end IDE drives and pretty much
On 09/11/2011 20:44, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
ok, just a quick thoughts / status update.
we've had it confirmed that the CPU is external 2gb addressing but
*internal* limited to 1gb (!)
little factory is still going over the BOM, but want to put in 512mb
DDR RAM ICs because they're c
On 11/05/2011 09:53 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
the wonderful "great firewall of china" has come ker-chungg down and
chopped off access to the supplier of the A10 SoC :) luckily there
are such things as "phones", y'know? all quite amusing.
btw thank you to everyone who has agreed t
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
[ok i'm going to do another cross-post in a bit which will give some
background and also perhaps some other topics for discussion, but i
wanted to cover this first. apologies for people for whom this is
just noise]
On Tue,
On 08/23/2011 07:01 PM, omall...@msu.edu wrote:
Quoting Gordan Bobic :
Unfortunately there is no way I could make it, but on the subject of 3D
support on ARM, Luke recently mentioned something that initially seemed
outlandish but upon closer examination doesn't seem like a bad idea. As
w
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:11:34 +0100, Steve McIntyre
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:15:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi folks,
Following on from the founding of the cross-distro ARM mailing list,
I'd like to propose an ARM summit at this year's Linux Plumbers
conference [1]. I'm hoping fo
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:21:43 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Gordan Bobic
wrote:
in the first place), why has the MX53QSB not been chosen as the
board
for the freedombox foundation to honour its obligations to its
kickstarter sponsors?
Another
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:33:58 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Tim Small wrote:
On 17/08/11 15:00, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Marvell is pretty good. Whether that is through Marvell's
contribution
or not I don't know, but in terms of what th
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:39:17 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
[ um... freedombox people... tell me... why was the shitty little
NDA-loving armv5 marvell sheeva guwwu pwug chosen over the
freedom-respecting really rather dishy little IMX53QSB? i realise
it's good to break marvell of
On 08/13/2011 02:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
This sort of question should always be considered in the context of the lead
time, i.e. "in 9 months time when TI and NVidia and Freescale (etc.) have
announced the
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:46:11 +0200, Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
wrote:
Gordan Bobic writes:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:42:33 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
Are there any decent-looking Cortex A9 boards out or upcoming
which
support
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:39:19 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Gordan Bobic
wrote:
question (for everyone): if there existed a board which used a
single-core 800mhz Cortex A9, maximum hard limit of 512mb RAM, but
also had SATA-II and 10/100
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:42:33 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
Are there any decent-looking Cortex A9 boards out or upcoming which
support ethernet and SATA? So far I've found:
PandaBoard --- $180, ethernet, no SATA.
Samsung Origen
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:13:35 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
I just finished the creation of a repository on people.debian.org
that provides the package
33 matches
Mail list logo
