Re: unsubscribing troubles

2006-09-22 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:38:13 -0400, James wrote: > Hello, > > Using this interface: > http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel > > I cannot seem to get the passwd or unsubscribe from the list. > > Any help is appreciated. > > > James Same thing happened to me at the sam

Re: Deciding new arm EABI port name

2006-04-04 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:30:24 +0200, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote: > Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > >> [quoted text muted] > What is the kernel in your view, btw? AFAICT it is still software;-) It's software that's already compatible with -mhard-float and -msoft-float. Would

Re: Deciding new arm EABI port name

2006-04-04 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:20:00 +0200, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote: > Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > >> [quoted text muted] > I think we can restrict ourselves to most useful, popular > ones (i.e., the ones that can/will be actively maintained): > > arm-> arm4, le, glibc, oabi-hard-

Re: Deciding new arm EABI port name

2006-04-04 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:43:29 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:28:29AM -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: >> That is precisely why I am suggesting here that -mhard-float be dumped >> altogether in favor of -msoft-float, but have the soft-float >> implementa

Re: Deciding new arm EABI port name

2006-04-03 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:25:17 +0200, peter.kourzanov wrote: >> This may very well be a nauseatingly unworkable suggestion, but for the >> old ABI, it seems to me the most optimal compromise can be achieved if >> everything used a shared-object soft-float library that could be swapped >> out and rep

Re: Deciding new arm EABI port name

2006-04-02 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:07:16 +0100, Martin Guy wrote: >> Isn't FPU something more related to the CPU rather than LIBC or ABI? > > Yes and no. There are many interrelated questions. > > There is the physical FPU that a particular user has in their > computer, which is currently one of: > none,

Re: ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?

2006-03-12 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Mar 12, 2006, at 5:43 AM, Riku Voipio wrote: On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:26:00AM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: The ARM port desperately needs more of its users to be counted for Debian to continue support for the architecture. Actually we need more developers and faster hardware, not

ARM archive qualification still jeopardized?

2006-03-12 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
The ARM port desperately needs more of its users to be counted for Debian to continue support for the architecture. Please register at: http://buildd.net/cgi/archvote.phtml If Debian stops supporting ARM, Linux on this platform will cease to be an off-the-shelf solution. -- "Consider that two