Re: Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Excellent! The long binutils compiles were triggering a bug in the Hurd, > causing a crash, so I had to remove it from the autobuilder. I will > add it back in now. Thanks for letting me know this. All the more reason to get cross-compiling situated a

Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Just wanted to announce this... I'm removing the cross-compiler patches to debian/rules, etc. as of the upcoming 2.11.90.0.5-1. Until we get a better method for compiling these, I'd rather not have the packages available. As it stands, it takes several hours to build binutils and all of the cro

Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?

2001-03-08 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Philip Blundell wrote: > I think ARM is okay at the moment; almost all the packages that are unbuilt > have > actually failed, so human intervention is what's needed rather than machine > cycles. Alpha looks like maybe it could benefit from an autobuilder, and I > do > a

Re: the continuing adventures of XFree86 4.0.1

2000-12-07 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > [Please follow-up to debian-x if you want me to see it.] > > 4.0.1-10 is in the archive for i386, sparc, and powerpc. John Goerzen is > building for alpha. Compiles for m68k and arm are still needed. Is John building them? I thought I was! :-) I

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > The new gcc package build failed on Alpha during stage1 of the gpc > build. I can try eliminating gpc from the build for now (allowing me to > continue to get the new glibc stuff working), if that's an > option... This prob

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-25 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t