Hi,
could the buildd admins please enable building for amiga-fdisk and upload
the resulting packages (powerpc has been built, but it seems it was never
uploaded).
thanks,
Christian
- Forwarded message from Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#497165: amiga-fdisk-cross is not bei
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:39:15AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#167780: 0.3.4 is in testing]
> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux site
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Newsgroups: local.debian-68k
>
> >
> > | > If in fact I, as maintainer, have a choice in
Hi,
according to this
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=moon-buggy&ver=0.5.53-8&arch=arm&stamp=1091882341&file=log&as=raw
moon-buggy has been built successfully some time ago. Can you please upload
it? arm is the only arch missing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/pool/main/m/moon-buggy>ll moon-buggy_0.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 06:14:33PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian T. Steigies" writes:
> >On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:11:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you run it under gdb and see where i
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:11:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can you run it under gdb and see where it crashes? It would be
> interesting to see the output of "objdump -r" on libbitmap.a and
> libpcidata.a, too.
Sure, logfiles at:
http://people.debian.org/~cts/x4.1/
Note, this version
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:20:38PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian T. Steigies" writes:
> >Do you know if these patches could help makeing the m68k elfloader work?
>
> What's the problem with the m68k elfloader, exa
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 04:04:51PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> So, could someone else please take my patches and build and upload X for
> us? They're at:
>
> > http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/311_arm_compiler_h.diff
> > http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/312_arm_elfloader.diff
> > http://ly
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Here's the first cut of 4.1.0.
Is there a way to avoid downloading the complete source again? I have 4.0.3,
maybe I can rsync of patch or whatever? I have space and fast access at
work, but only slow access at home (and no more sne
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:21:24PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > And apt failed to build as well:
>
> But it is already built for ARM. I did it myself.
>
> auric{jgg}~#madison apt
>apt | 0.3.1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:31:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Any chance of updated glibc, perl and apt packages? glibc's had a minor
> revision bump (2.2.1-1 to 2.2.2-1), perl's had a major reorganisation, and
> well, apt finally got released.
And apt failed to build as well:
[..
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:31:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Any chance of updated glibc, perl and apt packages? glibc's had a minor
> revision bump (2.2.1-1 to 2.2.2-1), perl's had a major reorganisation, and
> well, apt finally got released.
Both perl and apt failed to build. Se
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:34:44PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> I have a spare A1200 with 68030 processor lying around, it has no harddisk
> though.
>
> Would that count toward donating hardware ?
Send it to Ben, if he can keep up with the "speed" of the machine.
Christian
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled
> against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x
You mean we have to make binNMUs of glibc? Or will you make a new upload
which explicitly requests
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:36:30PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Here's the list of pkgs from potato-porposed-updates which I used for
> boot-floppies 2.2.17:
>
> base-config_0.33_i386.deb
> debconf-tiny_0.2.80.17_all.deb
> libc6_2.1.3-13_i386.deb
> locales_2.1.3-13_i386.deb
> makedev
14 matches
Mail list logo
