Re: Bug#717816: Support for "ads" in D-I (was: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files)

2013-07-25 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org): > I've never even heard of an ADS board. Whatever it is, I think it's clear > that the support can be killed off now. Done. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Support for "ads" in D-I (was: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files)

2013-07-25 Thread Christian PERRIER
lete and not supported anymore or is it still supported? If so, is this userdevfs really useful? - Forwarded message from Christian PERRIER - Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:46:53 +0200 From: Christian PERRIER To: Ansgar Burchardt , 717...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#717816: userdevfs: incl

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

2011-05-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Peter Littmann (peter.littm...@kpl-consulting.de): > Please could you declare this wish for i386 daily builds further in detail? > > What are the requirements for this person you seek? > > I was a HP-UX System Administrator in the past, have some knowledge > about Debian, Linux from Scra

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

2011-05-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Martin Michlmayr (t...@cyrius.com): > I actually tried to reproduce this problem on my ARM box yesterday and > couldn't. Joey, does your build nmachine have very little RAM? Can > you try to run mkdns323fw manually to see what's going on? > > (Unfortunately, the TS-209 image later on fa

armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

2011-05-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Hello, dring armel daily builds of D-I, we seem to get this error: > * FAILED BUILD: armel May 08 18:11 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console > > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log mkdns323fw -k ./tmp/orion5x_network-conso

Please unblock linpopup 1.2.0-8.1 and check the ARM build

2007-01-15 Thread Christian Perrier
This package was one of the last in my first l10n NMU campaign. The 1.2.0-8.1 release fixed a bunch of debconf l10n issues and featured a debconf templates rewrite. The package is not built on arm. It seems that it built successfully but was never uploaded. ARM porters and buildd admins, could you

Re: Building shadow on arm

2006-10-27 Thread Christian Perrier
> > Is it possible for an arm porter to try to bring some input on the > > build failure, and possibly help solving that issue? That is of course > > needed for us, shadow maitnainers, to get shadow in testing. > > > > It builds correctly on my machine, so it's is probably a transient > problem wi

Building shadow on arm

2006-10-27 Thread Christian Perrier
The latest shadow upload fixes a RC bug (#394182) but, for some strange (at least to me and Nicolas François, the package co-maintainer) reason, failed to build on arm. Is it possible for an arm porter to try to bring some input on the build failure, and possibly help solving that issue? That is o